Multipoint Ignition Electrode Heat Value Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing multipoint ignition devices face issues with electrode pair temperature regulation, leading to carbon deposition and secondary voltage leakage at low temperatures, and pre-ignition at high temperatures, resulting in pollution and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

The solution involves adjusting the heat values of electrode pairs in a multipoint ignition device by varying the contact area between intermediate members and the head gasket, using modifications such as altering dimensions and surface processing to optimize heat radiation properties, ensuring temperatures remain within a suitable range of 450°C to 1000°C.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If the temperature of the electrode pair is kept low to prevent pre-ignition, then the electrode pair does not become a heat source, but carbon sticks to the electrode pair causing pollution and secondary voltage leakage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode pair temperatureVSAvoidcarbon deposition
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by giving each electrode pair a customized heat value tailored to its specific disposal position within the combustion chamber. Electrode pairs at different locations experience different thermal environments, so each is assigned a heat value (through intermediate member design) that is locally optimized for its position, preventing both carbon deposition and pre-ignition at that specific location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the heat value parameter of each electrode pair by varying the contact area between intermediate members and the electrode pairs. By adjusting this contact area, the heat radiation properties of each electrode pair are modified to achieve the optimal temperature range (450°C to 1000°C) for preventing carbon deposition while avoiding pre-ignition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the temperature of the electrode pair is raised above 1000°C to ensure self-cleaning, then carbon deposition is prevented, but the electrode pair becomes a heat source causing pre-ignition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon deposition preventionVSAvoidelectrode pair temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent prevents overheating by locally optimizing each electrode pair's heat value according to its position. This ensures that no electrode pair exceeds the safe temperature threshold that would cause pre-ignition, while still maintaining sufficient temperature for self-cleaning where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent controls the temperature parameter by adjusting the heat value of each electrode pair through modified intermediate members. By changing the contact area, the heat radiation is optimized to keep temperatures below 1000°C and prevent pre-ignition while maintaining enough heat for carbon removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If a uniform heat value is applied to all electrode pairs, then manufacturing is simplified, but electrode pairs at different positions cannot maintain optimal temperatures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat value uniformityVSAvoidtemperature control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the heat value specification into individual electrode pairs rather than applying a uniform value. Each electrode pair is assigned a specific heat value through its intermediate member design, allowing customized temperature control for each position while maintaining relatively simple manufacturing through standardized intermediate member variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by optimizing the heat value of each electrode pair according to its specific disposal position. This ensures that electrode pairs in different thermal environments maintain appropriate temperatures, improving reliability while the variations in intermediate members remain manageable for manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively prevents pollution and pre-ignition by maintaining optimal electrode pair temperatures, enhancing engine performance and fuel efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

Respective heat values of the plurality of electrode pairs are set individually by varying a contact area between the plurality of intermediate members and the interposed member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentEP2020717B1Method to individually set respective heat values of a plurality of electrode pairs
Publication Date: 2013.01.16 MIYAMA
  • EP2020717B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2020717B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2020717B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A multipoint ignition device comprises: a head gasket (1) interposed between a cylinder head and a cylinder block of an engine, having an opening (3) in a position corresponding to a cylinder opening portion; and a plurality of intermediate members (6) connected respectively to a plurality of electrode pairs (2) and held in the head gasket (1). Respective heat values of the plurality of electrode pairs (2) are set individually by varying the contact area between the plurality of intermediate members (6) and the head gasket (1) according to the respective disposal positions of the plurality of intermediate members (6).