IHS Accident Diagnosis via Fan and Thermal Data Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mobile Information Handling Systems (IHSs) face challenges in diagnosing accidents, such as drops or impacts, which can result in hidden damage that manifests as difficult-to-diagnose errors over time, increasing support burdens on Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs).

Innovation Solution

The implementation of systems and methods within IHSs that include processors and memories with program instructions to collect fan data, thermal data, or acoustic data in response to accidents. These data collections are compared to stored baseline data to perform accident remediation or mitigation operations, which may include notifying users or IT decision-makers, initiating data backups, or dispatching replacement parts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If mobile IHSs are designed for increased mobility and versatility, then user convenience is improved, but the chances of accidents and hidden damage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenienceVSAvoidaccident risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary diagnostic actions by collecting baseline fan data, thermal data, and acoustic data during normal operation before accidents occur. This baseline data is stored and later compared against post-accident measurements to detect hidden damage, enabling early detection before failures manifest.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring fan performance, thermal characteristics, and acoustic emissions, then comparing real-time data against baseline values. When deviations indicate potential damage from accidents, the system provides feedback through notifications to users or IT decision-makers, enabling proactive response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive accident diagnosis is implemented through data collection and comparison, then diagnostic accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a universal diagnostic framework that collects multiple types of data (fan performance, thermal characteristics, acoustic emissions) through a single integrated approach. The same baseline data collection and comparison mechanism applies across different components, simplifying the overall system architecture while maintaining comprehensive diagnostic capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-diagnosis by automatically collecting diagnostic data, comparing it against stored baselines, and generating notifications without requiring external technician intervention. This self-service capability reduces the need for complex manual troubleshooting procedures while maintaining high diagnostic accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If manual troubleshooting and root cause analysis are performed by technicians, then diagnostic depth is improved, but support burden and time required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroot cause analysis capabilityVSAvoidsupport time
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs diagnostic operations by collecting baseline data during normal operation, comparing post-accident measurements against these baselines, and generating notifications without requiring technician intervention. This eliminates the need for manual troubleshooting while maintaining comprehensive diagnostic capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary diagnostic actions by pre-collecting and storing baseline fan data, thermal data, and acoustic data during normal operation. This baseline information is ready for immediate comparison against post-accident measurements, enabling rapid automated diagnosis without requiring technicians to perform initial data collection or analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If continuous monitoring of fan data, thermal data, and acoustic data is implemented, then early detection of hidden damage is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehidden damage detectionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic monitoring by collecting baseline data at defined intervals during normal operation and performing comparisons at specific trigger events such as accidents. This periodic approach maintains the ability to detect hidden damage while reducing continuous energy consumption compared to constant real-time monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20250181441A1DIAGNOSING ACCIDENTS IN INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEMS (IHSs)
Publication Date: 2025.06.05 DELL PROD LP
  • US20250181441A1 patent drawing
  • US20250181441A1 patent drawing
  • US20250181441A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for diagnosing accidents in Information Handling Systems (IHSs) are described. In some embodiments, an IHS may include a processor and a memory coupled to the processor, the memory having program instructions stored thereon that, upon execution, cause an Operating System (OS) to: in response an accident, collect fan data and, based at least in part upon a comparison between collected fan data and stored fan data, perform an accident remediation or mitigation operation.