IL-12 and CTLA-4 Antibody Combination for Glioblastoma Therapy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current treatments for glioblastoma multiforme, the most aggressive malignant primary brain tumor, are ineffective due to the tumor's invasive growth pattern and resistance to conventional therapies, and systemic administration of IL-12 is hindered by adverse events at effective doses.

Innovation Solution

Administering a recombinant IL-12 polypeptide with a human immunoglobulin G crystallisable fragment and a non-agonist CTLA-4 antibody, either locally into the tumor or systemically, to enhance immune response and inhibit tumor growth.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If IL-12 is administered systemically at effective doses, then tumor-suppressive properties are achieved, but serious adverse events occur including fatalities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetumor-suppressive propertiesVSAvoidadverse events
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by administering IL-12 directly into the tumor tissue rather than systemically. This localized delivery ensures high concentration of IL-12 at the tumor site where it is needed for anti-tumor activity, while minimizing exposure to healthy tissues and reducing the risk of systemic adverse events. The injection method targets the tumor mass specifically, creating a localized therapeutic effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses an intermediary approach by combining IL-12 with anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. The anti-CTLA-4 antibody acts as a mediator that blocks the inhibitory CTLA-4 pathway, enhancing the immune system's response to IL-12. This combination allows for lower doses of IL-12 to be effective, thereby reducing adverse events while maintaining tumor-suppressive properties. The anti-CTLA-4 antibody intermediates the immune activation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional treatments are used for glioblastoma, then standard therapy is applied, but the tumor's invasive growth pattern and resistance make treatments ineffective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestandard therapy applicationVSAvoidtreatment effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by fundamentally altering the treatment approach from conventional chemotherapy and radiation to immunotherapy with IL-12 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. This changes the mechanism of action from direct cytotoxic effects to immune-mediated tumor destruction. The combination therapy parameters (dose, schedule, route of administration) are optimized to overcome tumor resistance and invasive growth patterns that make conventional treatments ineffective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a composite therapeutic approach by combining two different immunomodulatory agents: IL-12 (a cytokine that activates immune cells) and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies (that block inhibitory immune checkpoints). This composite therapy creates synergistic effects where IL-12 stimulates immune cell activation and proliferation, while anti-CTLA-4 prevents immune suppression, together overcoming tumor resistance and enhancing treatment effectiveness against invasive glioblastoma.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Quantity of substance

If IL-12 is administered alone, then immune stimulation occurs, but immunosuppressive mechanisms limit tumor eradication

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmune response activationVSAvoidtumor eradication completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges two immunotherapeutic mechanisms by combining IL-12 administration with anti-CTLA-4 antibody treatment. IL-12 stimulates immune cell activation, proliferation, and cytotoxic activity against tumor cells. The anti-CTLA-4 antibody merges with this effect by blocking the CTLA-4 inhibitory pathway, preventing immune suppression. Together, these combined therapies overcome the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and achieve more complete tumor eradication than either therapy alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where anti-CTLA-4 antibodies counteract the immunosuppressive feedback signals that tumors generate. Tumors typically activate CTLA-4-mediated inhibitory pathways to suppress immune responses. By blocking CTLA-4, the therapy interrupts this negative feedback loop, allowing sustained immune activation and cytotoxic activity against tumor cells, thereby improving complete tumor eradication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240238377A1Methods of tumour therapy with a combination medicament comprising il-12 and an agent for blockade of t-cell inhibitory molecules
Publication Date: 2024.07.18 UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH
  • US20240238377A1 patent drawing
  • US20240238377A1 patent drawing
  • US20240238377A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a combination medicament for treatment of malignant neoplastic disease. The combination medicament comprises an IL-12 polypeptide having a biological activity of IL-12 or a nucleic acid expression vector comprising a sequence encoding such IL-12 polypeptide, and a non-agonist blockade of T-cell inhibitory molecules, including non-agonist LAG-3 ligand, non-agonist TIM-3 ligand, non-agonist BLTA ligand, non-agonist TIGIT ligand, non-agonist VISTA ligand, non-agonist B7/H3 ligand, non-agonist CTLA-4 ligand or non-agonist PD-1 ligand, particularly an anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1 immunoglobulin G.