Illumination Pattern Optimization for Defect Inspection Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing inspection methods struggle to distinguish between defects and non-defects on workpieces due to variations in appearance and surface states, leading to missed defects or false positives, as they primarily focus on emphasizing defects without considering variations in non-defective products or individual workpieces.

Innovation Solution

An inspection device and method that sets image areas for non-defective and defective products, using a first index to maximize differences and a second index to minimize variations within the same label, optimizing illumination patterns to enhance defect recognition while reducing background variations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If an illumination pattern is optimized to emphasize defects in workpieces, then defect detection capability is improved, but variations in non-defective products and individual workpieces are also emphasized, leading to false positives and missed defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoidinspection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the evaluation process into two distinct indices: a first index for evaluating defect detection capability and a second index for evaluating variations in non-defective products. By separately calculating and balancing these two indices, the system can optimize illumination patterns that emphasize defects while simultaneously suppressing background variations, thus resolving the contradiction between detection capability and inspection accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the evaluation parameters from a single defect-emphasis metric to a dual-parameter system that independently evaluates both defect detection performance and background variation suppression. This parameter transformation allows the optimization process to balance both objectives, preventing false positives while maintaining high defect detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If manual optimization of illumination patterns is performed to reliably detect defects, then detection performance is improved, but the number of processes and time required significantly increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection performanceVSAvoidoptimization process efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the system to automatically evaluate and optimize illumination patterns using the dual-index method without requiring manual intervention. The computer automatically calculates the first index for defect detection and the second index for background variations, then iteratively optimizes the illumination pattern based on these evaluations, significantly reducing the time and effort compared to manual optimization while maintaining high detection performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the evaluation results of the first and second indices are used to iteratively adjust and optimize the illumination pattern. The system continuously evaluates the current illumination pattern's performance on both defect detection and background suppression, then uses this feedback to refine the pattern until optimal performance is achieved, automating what previously required repeated manual adjustment and review

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3940373B1Inspection device and method
Publication Date: 2026.04.08 OMRON CORP
  • EP3940373B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3940373B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3940373B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

This inspection device comprises: an image-capturing unit which obtains an evaluation workpiece image that is captured with a plurality of predetermined illumination light emission patterns in order to obtain an optimized illumination light emission pattern with which the influence of non-defective product variations of a workpiece can be suppressed while defects in a workpiece are emphasized; an image area setting unit which sets a plurality of image areas associated with a plurality of different labels; an optimization calculation unit which generates a first index of which the output value increases as a difference between an image area associated with a non-defective label and an image area associated with a defective label increases, and a second index of which the output value increases as a difference or contrast between the image areas associated with the non-defective label increases, and calculates an illumination light emission pattern for inspection such that the first index becomes larger and the second index becomes smaller; and a determination unit which performs image processing on an inspection workpiece image captured with the illumination light emission pattern for inspection, and determines a pass/fail label of a workpiece to be inspected.