ILT Transaction Routing for Teller-Approved Off-Us Banking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing In-Lobby Teller (ILT) terminals face challenges in efficiently handling transactions that require teller approval, particularly those exceeding predefined limits, and in facilitating off-site banking transactions without additional human intervention.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for processing teller-approved banking transactions using an off-site partner switch that reroutes and executes off-us transactions, allowing ILT machines to handle requests exceeding limits and integrating with external banking systems for verification and approval, reducing the need for additional human interaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If ILT terminals are designed with enhanced functionality to handle diverse transactions, then service capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments transaction processing into multiple components: the ILT terminal handles customer interaction and basic validation, the switch handles routing and switching logic, and external systems handle specialized processing. This segmentation allows each component to be simpler while the overall system provides enhanced functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The switch is designed as a universal platform that can handle multiple types of transactions (deposits, withdrawals, transfers, check cashing) and support multiple external systems. This multi-functionality approach allows a single device to provide diverse services without requiring separate specialized hardware for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If ILT terminals require teller approval for transactions exceeding limits, then transaction security is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction securityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation at the ILT terminal by comparing transaction amounts against predefined limits before routing to the switch. This preliminary action identifies which transactions require teller approval in advance, allowing the system to prepare appropriate routing paths and minimize waiting time during actual processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The switch acts as an intermediary between the ILT terminal and external systems, managing the approval workflow efficiently. It can buffer transactions awaiting approval, coordinate with multiple external systems simultaneously, and optimize the timing of approval requests to minimize overall processing time while maintaining security requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If off-us transactions are routed through external systems, then transaction capability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The switch serves as an intermediary that abstracts the complexity of external system interactions from the ILT terminal. It manages routing logic, protocol translations, and coordination with multiple external systems, allowing the terminal to remain simple while supporting diverse off-us transactions through standardized interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the switch monitors transaction flows, system statuses, and performance metrics from external systems. This feedback enables dynamic routing decisions, load balancing, and error handling that simplify the overall system operation while maintaining high transaction capability across multiple external partners.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3590085B1Automated transaction system and method
Publication Date: 2025.12.31 DIEBOLD NIXDORF INCORPORATED
  • EP3590085B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3590085B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3590085B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system and method provide for enhanced in-lobby-teller (ILT) machines. A banking system includes a local switch, a bank core, a teller terminal, and an ILT machine. The teller terminal allows a bank teller to approve customer requests entered at an ILT. The ILT receives requests and determines if teller approval is needed for the request. If so, the request is forwarded to a teller/teller terminal. When approved, an indication is set in the banking request and the now approved request is sent back to the ILT machine. The ILT machine detects the approval indication and transmits the request to the external- partner switch. This switch returns the transaction request to the local bank switch for forwarding to the bank core. The core is may update account information associated with the banking request and then route it back to the ILT where any remaining tasks of the transaction request are completed.