Digital Image Acceptability Detection Using Edge Density Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for automatically determining the acceptability of digital images for printing are inadequate, particularly in assessing sharpness, leading to unnecessary prints of low quality and increased costs due to reliance on visual inspection and insufficient differentiation of image quality.

Innovation Solution

A method that identifies important areas in an image, calculates salient acceptability features, and determines image acceptability based on these features to prevent unacceptable images from being printed, using edge detection algorithms like Canny's to assess edge density and noise levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If visual inspection is used to detect unacceptable images, then operator judgment can identify poor quality images, but the process is time-consuming and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection with an automated computer-based system that uses image processing algorithms to detect sharpness and quality issues. The system automatically analyzes focus quality, edge sharpness, and other quality metrics without human intervention, thereby eliminating time loss while maintaining or improving detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables images to self-assess their own quality through automated algorithms that evaluate sharpness, focus, and other quality parameters. Each image is independently analyzed by the computer system using predefined criteria, allowing rapid self-service quality determination without requiring operator time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If all images are printed regardless of quality, then no images are lost, but wasteful printing of low quality images increases costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage output completenessVSAvoidprinting material waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary quality assessment of images before they are printed. By evaluating sharpness, focus, and other quality parameters in advance, the system identifies unacceptable images and prevents them from being printed, thereby avoiding material waste while ensuring only quality images are output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the decision parameter for printing from a binary all-or-nothing approach to a quality-based selective approach. By introducing quality thresholds and acceptability criteria, the system dynamically determines which images meet the required standards for printing, optimizing both resource utilization and output quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If simple edge detection is used to assess sharpness, then processing is fast, but accuracy in detecting poor focus is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidsharpness detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different analysis methods to different regions of the image based on local quality requirements. Important areas such as the main subject receive more rigorous sharpness analysis using multiple algorithms and metrics, while less critical areas use simpler assessment methods, thereby maintaining high accuracy where needed while preserving overall processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines multiple edge detection algorithms and quality assessment methods into a composite analysis framework. By integrating several detection techniques with different strengths, the system achieves superior sharpness detection accuracy that leverages the advantages of each individual method while compensating for their respective limitations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive quality analysis is performed on all images, then detection accuracy improves, but processing complexity and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the quality analysis process into distinct stages and components, including preliminary screening, detailed sharpness analysis, and final acceptability determination. By dividing the comprehensive analysis into manageable segments, the system achieves high detection accuracy while keeping each processing stage relatively simple and efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS7809197B2Method for automatically determining the acceptability of a digital image
Publication Date: 2010.10.05 MONUMENT PEAK VENTURES LLC
  • US7809197B2 patent drawing
  • US7809197B2 patent drawing
  • US7809197B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for automatically determining the acceptability of an input image for a predetermined output operation, such as printing, includes the steps of: (a) identifying one or more important areas in the input image; (b) calculating a salient acceptability feature for each of the important areas; (c) determining the acceptability of the input image from the salient acceptability features of the important areas; and (d) implementing the predetermined output operation based on the acceptability of the input image determined in step (c).