Image Alignment Using Region-Based Similarity Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current image alignment techniques often reduce detail in images and fail to account for the quality and strength of region matches, leading to suboptimal alignment results.

Innovation Solution

A method that selects regions in one image and finds corresponding regions in another based on a similarity function, optimizing transformation parameters to enhance alignment accuracy without smoothing the images.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If image smoothing is applied to improve alignment convergence, then alignment speed is improved, but image detail and quality are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment speedVSAvoidimage detail
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the image into multiple regions and performs alignment evaluation on each region separately rather than processing the entire image. This segmentation allows the algorithm to work with smaller data units, improving computational efficiency and convergence speed without requiring global image smoothing that would degrade overall image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different quality criteria to different regions by evaluating region-based similarity measures. Each region can be assessed independently with appropriate similarity metrics, allowing the system to maintain high image quality in critical areas while still achieving efficient alignment through localized processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If pixel-by-pixel intensity comparison is used to achieve precise alignment, then alignment accuracy is improved, but computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the image into multiple regions and performs similarity comparisons on these regions rather than comparing every pixel across the entire image. This reduces the computational burden from O(N*M) pixel comparisons to O(n*m) region comparisons, where n < N and m < M, significantly lowering computational complexity while maintaining alignment precision through careful region selection and similarity metric design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses region-based sampling as a partial action approach, selecting representative regions to evaluate alignment quality rather than processing all pixels. This partial processing provides sufficient alignment accuracy for practical applications while dramatically reducing computational requirements compared to exhaustive pixel-by-pixel comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If region-based similarity measures are implemented to improve alignment quality, then alignment accuracy is improved, but the complexity of region selection and matching increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment accuracyVSAvoidregion matching complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary region selection and candidate identification before the main alignment optimization process. By pre-selecting representative regions and establishing initial similarity assessments, the system reduces the complexity of region matching during the iterative optimization phase, making the overall process more manageable while maintaining high alignment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where region-based similarity measures are continuously evaluated during the transformation optimization process. This feedback guides the iterative refinement of transformation parameters, allowing the system to achieve high alignment accuracy by progressively improving the match based on region similarity assessments rather than requiring complex upfront region matching logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8385687B1Methods for determining a transformation between images
Publication Date: 2013.02.26 MATROX ELECTRONICS SYST LTD
  • US8385687B1 patent drawing
  • US8385687B1 patent drawing
  • US8385687B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In accordance with one embodiment, a method of determining a transformation between a first image and a second image includes acts of, for at least one region in the first image, determining a corresponding region in the second image as a function of a transformation parameter and determining a similarity function as a function of the transformation parameter between the region in the first image and the corresponding region in the second image. In one embodiment, the method further includes acts of determining a similarity function between the first image and the second image using the similarity function for the at least one region, and determining a value of the transformation parameter, wherein the value substantially optimizes the similarity function between the first image and the second image.