Image Analysis Module for Event Detection in Surveillance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current surveillance systems rely heavily on human observation, which is inefficient and costly, as they struggle to detect and respond to events of interest in real-time, particularly in environments like art galleries where rapid intervention is necessary to prevent damage to valuable assets.

Innovation Solution

A method of recording and analyzing sequences of images from cameras to identify events of interest, allowing for automatic detection and alerting operators, while also optimizing camera settings for improved image quality and scheduling maintenance based on camera health analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple cameras are deployed to monitor all areas, then coverage and detection capability are improved, but the complexity of monitoring all camera outputs increases and human operators cannot effectively review all feeds simultaneously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent detection capabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

An image analysis module is introduced as an intermediary between the cameras and human operators. This module automatically analyzes images from multiple cameras, identifies events of interest, and presents only relevant information to operators, thereby managing the complexity of monitoring numerous camera feeds while maintaining reliable event detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-analysis through automated image processing and event detection algorithms. The image analysis module independently reviews camera outputs, identifies suspicious activities, and generates alerts without requiring continuous human observation of all feeds, thus reducing operational complexity while maintaining detection reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If human operators manually monitor all camera feeds, then event detection may occur, but the cost and time required for effective surveillance increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent detection capabilityVSAvoidsurveillance efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The manual mechanical process of human operators reviewing camera feeds is replaced with an automated image analysis system. The module uses computer vision algorithms to automatically detect events of interest, substituting human labor with automated processing that operates continuously without fatigue, thereby improving surveillance efficiency while maintaining detection reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The surveillance system performs self-monitoring through automated image analysis. The module independently processes camera feeds, identifies events, and generates alerts without requiring continuous human intervention, thus eliminating the time and cost costs associated with manual surveillance while maintaining effective event detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If standard recording procedures are used for all images, then storage is simplified, but important details in specific areas of interest may be lost due to insufficient resolution or compression

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecording procedure simplicityVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different recording qualities to different regions of images. When an event of interest is detected, the image analysis module identifies the area of interest and applies enhanced recording parameters specifically to that region, while other areas use standard compression. This ensures high-quality capture of critical details while maintaining overall system simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The recording procedure dynamically adjusts based on detected events. The system transitions from standard uniform recording to selective high-quality recording of identified areas of interest. This dynamic adaptation ensures that image quality is optimized precisely when and where needed, without permanently increasing complexity of the recording system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8953674B2Recording a sequence of images using two recording procedures
Publication Date: 2015.02.10 ENVYSION INC
  • US8953674B2 patent drawing
  • US8953674B2 patent drawing
  • US8953674B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sequence of images received from a camera is recorded according to a first procedure. The images are analyzed to identify events of interest, and upon identifying an event of interest, an area of interest of a plurality of said images is identified. The identified area is recorded according to a second procedure.