Refining Image Annotations via Confidence Threshold Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image search systems face challenges in accurately identifying high-confidence labels and images for training image relevance models, leading to decreased precision due to inclusion of labels and images that are difficult to correlate, such as overly specific or general annotations.

Innovation Solution

The method involves determining confidence values for image labels based on precision and frequency thresholds, identifying high-confidence labels and images, and excluding those that do not meet these thresholds from the training set to refine the image relevance model, thereby improving the accuracy of image annotations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If all available image labels are included in the training set, then the quantity of training data increases, but the precision of image annotations decreases due to inclusion of low-confidence labels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of training imagesVSAvoidprecision of image annotations
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the training image set into high-confidence images and low-confidence images based on confidence value thresholds. This segmentation allows the system to selectively use only high-confidence images for training, thereby maintaining annotation precision while still utilizing a substantial portion of the available data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different confidence values to different labels within the training set. Each image label is evaluated individually, and only those meeting the confidence threshold are retained. This ensures that each component of the training data meets a quality standard, preventing dilution of overall annotation precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If confidence thresholds are applied to filter labels, then the precision of annotations improves, but the quantity of training images decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of image annotationsVSAvoidquantity of training images
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by calculating confidence values for all image labels before the training process. This pre-evaluation allows the system to identify and retain only high-confidence labels in advance, ensuring that the training set is pre-filtered for quality without requiring post-training adjustments or retraining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by adjusting confidence thresholds to optimize the balance between precision and quantity. By modifying the threshold parameter, the system can control the proportion of training images retained, allowing flexible adjustment based on specific training requirements and available data volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If image relevance model uses all labels for training, then the model's versatility increases, but the reliability of relevance determination decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel's ability to handle diverse labelsVSAvoidreliability of relevance determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the label set into high-confidence and low-confidence categories, using only high-confidence labels for training the image relevance model. This segmentation ensures that the model learns from reliable data, improving the reliability of relevance determination while still maintaining versatility through the use of multiple high-confidence labels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using confidence values derived from user interaction data (clicks, views) to continuously refine the selection of training images. This feedback mechanism ensures that the model is trained on labels that have been validated by actual user behavior, thereby improving reliability while maintaining adaptability to user preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9727584B2Refining image annotations
Publication Date: 2017.08.08 GOOGLE LLC
  • US9727584B2 patent drawing
  • US9727584B2 patent drawing
  • US9727584B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems and apparatus for refining image annotations. In one aspect, a method includes receiving, for each image in a set of images, a corresponding set of labels determined to be indicative of subject matter of the image. For each label, one or more confidence values are determined. Each confidence value is a measure of confidence that the label accurately describes the subject matter of a threshold number of respective images to which it corresponds. Labels for which each of the one or more confidence values meets a respective confidence threshold are identified as high confidence labels. For each image in the set of images, labels in its corresponding set of labels that are high confidence labels are identified. Images having a corresponding set of labels that include at least a respective threshold number of high confidence labels are identified as high confidence images.