Image Annotation Platform With Dynamic Labeler Weighting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automated approaches to image annotation for autonomous vehicle control and simulation systems are inefficient and prone to mislabeling, due to variations in image quality and environmental conditions, and manual annotation is time-consuming and inconsistent.

Innovation Solution

An image annotation platform that assigns tasks to labelers, aggregates annotations, evaluates performance, and calculates payments based on quality, using a module structure that includes initial, assignment, aggregation, output, evaluation, and payment calculation modules to improve annotation accuracy and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual annotation is used, then annotation accuracy can be maintained, but time consumption and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces automated annotation tools and algorithms as intermediaries between manual annotation processes. These tools assist human annotators by providing pre-processed suggestions, automated object detection, and validation mechanisms, thereby maintaining high accuracy while reducing the time and effort required for manual annotation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The annotation process is divided into multiple stages: automated pre-annotation, human review and correction, and post-processing validation. This segmentation allows different methods to be applied at different stages, combining the speed of automation with the accuracy of manual review where it matters most.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If automated annotation approaches are used, then processing efficiency increases, but mislabeling errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidlabeling accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where automated annotation results are continuously evaluated and refined. Performance metrics are tracked, and the system learns from errors to improve future annotations. Human annotators also provide feedback on automated results, creating a closed-loop system that improves both efficiency and accuracy over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces purely mechanical automated annotation systems with intelligent systems that use machine learning and computer vision algorithms. These systems can understand context, handle variations in image quality and environmental conditions, and make more accurate labeling decisions while maintaining high processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If multiple labelers annotate the same image, then annotation quality can be improved through verification, but system complexity and coordination overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the annotation process based on image characteristics, task difficulty, and labeler performance. For simple images, fewer labelers are assigned; for complex or critical images, more labelers are assigned. This dynamic approach maintains high quality while avoiding unnecessary complexity for routine tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key parameters such as the number of labelers assigned, the level of verification required, and the complexity of annotation guidelines based on image properties and task requirements. This parameter adjustment allows the system to optimize between quality and complexity for different types of annotation tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10360257B2System and method for image annotation
Publication Date: 2019.07.23 CREATEAI INC
  • US10360257B2 patent drawing
  • US10360257B2 patent drawing
  • US10360257B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for implementing an image annotation platform are disclosed. A particular embodiment includes: registering a plurality of labelers to which annotation tasks are assigned; assigning annotation tasks to the plurality of labelers; determining if the annotation tasks can be closed or re-assigned to the plurality of labelers; aggregating annotations provided by the plurality of labelers as a result of the closed annotation tasks; evaluating a level of performance of the plurality of labelers in providing the annotations; and calculating payments for the plurality of labelers based on the quantity and quality of the annotations provided by the plurality of labelers.