Image Arrangement System for Illicit Content Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Content sharing systems face challenges in efficiently detecting illicit content among large sets of images due to human visual perception limitations and fatigue, leading to inaccurate identification and increased resource consumption.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that rearranges images based on computed concordance values characterizing visual detectability of illicit content features, using machine learning models and simulated annealing to optimize image ordering for improved detection accuracy and reduced user fatigue.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If users scan through large sets of images to detect illicit content, then detection coverage is improved, but user fatigue increases and detection accuracy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiduser fatigue
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the large set of images into smaller subsets that are processed and displayed in manageable groups. This segmentation reduces the cognitive load on users by presenting images in smaller, less fatiguing batches rather than overwhelming them with entire large sets at once, thereby maintaining detection accuracy while reducing user fatigue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary sorting and organization of images before presentation to users. By pre-processing the image sets to create optimized viewing sequences and groupings, the system prepares the data in advance to reduce the effort required during actual scanning, thus improving ease of operation without compromising detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If users scan through each image individually, then detection thoroughness is improved, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection thoroughnessVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple individual image scanning tasks into unified subset evaluations. By combining adjacent images into cohesive groups that are evaluated together, the system maintains thorough detection coverage while reducing the total time required, as users can process multiple images simultaneously within a single scanning action rather than sequentially one by one.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a one-dimensional sequential scanning approach to a multi-dimensional parallel evaluation approach. By organizing images into subsets that can be processed simultaneously across different dimensions (spatial grouping, thematic clustering), the system achieves thorough detection without linearly increasing time consumption, effectively adding parallel processing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If custom images are designed to attract viewers with curiosity-inducing content, then engagement is improved, but detection difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveengagementVSAvoiddetection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different processing and presentation qualities to different regions or types of images within the set. By identifying and highlighting specific local characteristics or patterns that indicate illicit content, the system maintains engagement through diverse image presentation while making detection easier by locally emphasizing suspicious features rather than treating all images uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary analysis layer between the custom images and the detection process. This intermediary layer processes the images to identify patterns, anomalies, or indicators of illicit content, acting as a mediator that preserves the engaging nature of the original images while simplifying the detection task through pre-analysis and feature extraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12080066B2Arranging a set of images for presentation to a user
Publication Date: 2024.09.03 GOOGLE LLC
  • US12080066B2 patent drawing
  • US12080066B2 patent drawing
  • US12080066B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A user request for a set of images is received via a graphical user interface, the subset of images having an initial order. A subset of neighboring images is selected, wherein the subset of neighboring images is ordered according to a first sequence. A first concordance value characterizing visual detectability of one or more illicit content features across images in the subset of neighboring images ordered according to the first sequence is computed. A second concordance value characterizing visual detectability of one or more illicit content features across images in the subset of neighboring images ordered according to a second sequence is computed. Responsive to a difference between the second concordance value and the first concordance value satisfying a predetermined condition, the subset of neighboring images is rearranged according to the second sequence. The previous steps are repeated for a plurality of additional subsets of neighboring images until each image of the set of images has been selected at least once as part of selected subsets of neighboring images to obtain a modified order of the set of images. The graphical user interface is caused to be modified to present the set of images on a grid according to the modified order.