Image-Augmented Transaction Validation for Secure Record Updates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Database transactions involving less data-rich transactions are prone to fraudulent or malicious behavior due to insufficient validation, leading to unauthorized or incorrect execution of transactions.

Innovation Solution

Utilize metadata, including image data, to determine a data richness category for transactions, employ a prediction model to identify object identifiers, and validate transaction amounts based on permitted object categories before executing database updates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If validation is performed using only basic transaction data, then processing speed is maintained, but transaction security deteriorates due to fraudulent activities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction securityVSAvoidvalidation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by obtaining image data and determining object identifiers before the actual transaction validation. This allows the system to pre-assess transaction legitimacy by analyzing images of purchases, object receipts, or related visual data, and store the results for later validation use, thereby enhancing security without compromising processing speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary mechanism by using image data and object identifiers as intermediate validation layers between basic transaction data and final approval. This intermediary step allows for more comprehensive verification without directly complicating the core transaction processing flow, as the image analysis serves as a mediating validation layer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If comprehensive data validation is performed for all transactions, then transaction accuracy is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by performing comprehensive image-based validation only for specific transaction types that require higher accuracy, such as data-poor transactions or those flagged for potential fraud. For other transactions, the system uses streamlined validation processes, thereby maintaining high accuracy where needed while minimizing processing time overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial validation by selectively applying image analysis and object identifier determination to only those transactions that require enhanced verification. This partial action approach ensures thorough validation for high-risk or ambiguous cases without subjecting all transactions to the same level of scrutiny, thus balancing accuracy with processing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If image data analysis is used to determine object identifiers, then fraud detection capability is enhanced, but computational resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection capabilityVSAvoidcomputational resource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary image analysis and object identifier determination in advance, storing the results for later validation. This preliminary action allows fraud detection capabilities to be prepared beforehand, reducing the need for intensive real-time computational resources during actual transaction processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses image data as a copy or representation of the actual transaction evidence (such as photos of purchases or receipts). By analyzing this visual copy rather than requiring physical inspection or additional verification steps, the system enhances fraud detection capability while consuming fewer computational resources than would be required for more intensive verification methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12373589B2Augmented data for security during record updates
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US12373589B2 patent drawing
  • US12373589B2 patent drawing
  • US12373589B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and related system may analyze metadata associated with a first set of transactions to determine whether to perform a second set of transactions. The method and related system may include determining a data category based on first device-provided data of a first database transaction indicating a first record associated with a second record, and may further include obtaining, based on whether the data category satisfies a first set of criteria, an identifier and an amount based on image data using a prediction model. The method may further include querying a database based on the identifier to obtain an indication that the identifier is mapped to an object category, validating the amount based on a result indicating whether the object category satisfies a second set of criteria, and causing a second transaction that changes fields of the first and second records.