Image Classification Using Averaged Feature Matrices for Incremental Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image classification technologies using deep neural networks face challenges in maintaining accuracy when adapting to new tasks without forgetting old tasks, leading to catastrophic forgetting, and struggle with overfitting when trained on small datasets.

Innovation Solution

An image classification apparatus and method that employs a feature extraction unit to generate deep and shallow feature vectors, calculates averaged feature matrices, and replaces weight matrices with these matrices to improve classification accuracy in incremental learning scenarios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If deep neural network parameters are re-learned in response to the entirety of the dataset to adapt to new tasks, then adaptability to new tasks is improved, but precision for old tasks deteriorates due to catastrophic forgetting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to new tasksVSAvoidprecision for old tasks
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the feature extraction process into multiple independent feature extractors, each specialized for specific tasks or data distributions. This allows the system to maintain separate feature representations for different tasks, preventing catastrophic forgetting while enabling adaptation to new tasks through the segmented architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimension by computing feature vectors from multiple different feature extractors simultaneously. Instead of relying on a single feature space, the system operates in a multi-dimensional feature space where each dimension corresponds to a different extractor's output, allowing preservation of old task knowledge while adapting to new tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If deep learning models are trained on a small number of images, then ease of operation is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to overfitting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of training with small dataVSAvoidgeneralization performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges feature vectors from multiple different feature extractors to create a comprehensive feature representation. By combining features from multiple sources trained on different data distributions, the system achieves better generalization performance even when individual extractors are trained on small datasets, reducing overfitting through feature fusion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates feature extractors with multi-functionality that can handle both base tasks and incremental tasks. The averaged feature matrix serves as a universal representation that works across different tasks and data distributions, allowing the system to maintain good performance with limited data per task while avoiding overfitting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260011138A1Image classification apparatus, image classification method, and non-transitory computer-readable medium having image classification program
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 JVC KENWOOD CORP
  • US20260011138A1 patent drawing
  • US20260011138A1 patent drawing
  • US20260011138A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A feature extraction unit outputs first and second feature vectors of an input image. An averaged first/second feature calculation unit calculates an averaged first/second feature vector by averaging first/second feature vectors of a given class and obtains an averaged first/second feature matrix by aggregating averaged first/second feature vectors of all classes. A first/second feature similarity calculation unit calculates a first/second similarity from the first/second feature vector of the input image and a first/second weight matrix. The averaged first/second feature calculation unit replaces the first/second weight matrix of the first/second feature similarity calculation unit with the averaged first/second feature matrix.