Image Classification via Segmentation and Confidence Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing object recognition technologies face challenges in accurately identifying objects in images due to issues like changes in character angle, aspect ratio, scale, lighting, and overlapping images, which affect the determination of a class associated with an image.

Innovation Solution

A method that determines a segmentation score and confidence score for image segments by comparing them to regions within an image, using these scores to identify classes without requiring known character fonts or orientations, enabling the recognition of uneven, skewed, or deformed strings and characters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional object recognition methods are used, then the system can identify objects in standard conditions, but it fails to accurately recognize objects with deformities such as skew, scale changes, lighting variations, and overlapping images

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject recognition accuracyVSAvoidhandling of image deformities
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the image into multiple candidate regions and generates multiple segmentations of the same image with different parameters. Each segmentation produces a set of candidate objects, allowing the system to evaluate objects under different segmentation assumptions and select the most reliable classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system varies segmentation parameters to generate multiple segmentations of the image. By changing parameters such as threshold values, region boundaries, and candidate object definitions, the system creates multiple interpretations of the same image data, enabling robust classification that accounts for various deformities and conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If the system requires known character fonts or orientations for recognition, then classification can be performed with predefined models, but it cannot recognize uneven, skewed, or deformed strings and characters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuse of predefined modelsVSAvoidrecognition of deformed characters
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a classification system that is universal and does not depend on specific fonts, orientations, or predefined models. The system can classify objects based on their visual characteristics alone, making it applicable to a wide variety of object types including deformed, skewed, or uneven characters without requiring specialized models for each case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-validation by generating multiple segmentations and candidate objects, then using confidence scores to determine the most reliable classification. The system does not rely on external predefined models but instead uses its own internal consistency checks across multiple segmentations to validate classifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the system uses multiple segmentations and candidate objects, then it can improve classification reliability, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification confidenceVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates multiple segmentations and candidate objects, which may seem excessive, but this redundancy enables reliable classification by allowing the system to compare results across different segmentations. The additional computational effort is justified by the significant improvement in classification confidence and accuracy, especially for difficult-to-classify objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses confidence scores as feedback to evaluate the quality of classifications. By computing confidence scores based on the agreement across multiple segmentations and candidate objects, the system can identify high-confidence classifications and potentially focus subsequent processing on lower-confidence cases, managing computational complexity through feedback-driven prioritization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8873856B1Determining a class associated with an image
Publication Date: 2014.10.28 MATROX ELECTRONICS SYST LTD
  • US8873856B1 patent drawing
  • US8873856B1 patent drawing
  • US8873856B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The technology is directed to determining a class associated with an image. In some examples, a method determines the class associated with an image. The method can include determining a segmentation score for an image segment based on a comparison of the image segment and a region of an image. The region of the image can be associated with the image segment. The method further includes determining a confidence score for the image segment based on the segmentation score and a classification score. The classification score can be indicative of a similarity between the image segment and at least one class. The method further includes determining a class associated with the image based on the confidence score. The method further includes outputting the class associated with the image.