Image Classifier for Suggested Actions in Digital Photo Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current image management techniques do not effectively recognize image content or user intent, leading to inefficiencies in managing large collections of images captured with digital devices, as they fail to provide assistance in categorizing or automating actions based on image content.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an image classifier that analyzes images to determine features and categories, suggesting actions such as archiving, sharing, or adding contacts, and automatically invoking relevant applications with extracted parameters, thereby reducing manual input and cognitive burden.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual image management techniques are used, then users have control over image organization, but users experience high cognitive burden and time consumption when managing large image collections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage management efficiencyVSAvoidtime for manual image categorization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of images using image classification models to automatically determine categories and suggested actions before the user needs to manage them. This pre-processing eliminates the need for manual categorization, directly resolving the contradiction by automating the time-consuming manual sorting process while maintaining user control through the suggested actions interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The image management system serves itself by automatically analyzing images, determining categories, and generating suggested actions without requiring user intervention for these tasks. The system uses machine learning models to autonomously manage image organization, thereby improving productivity while reducing the time users would otherwise spend on manual management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Extent of automation

If image analysis is performed to provide suggested actions, then image management becomes more automated and efficient, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic image action executionVSAvoidimage analysis system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the image management task into distinct components: image classification for category determination, parameter extraction for data retrieval, and suggested action generation for decision support. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, managing overall system complexity while achieving high automation through coordinated operation of these modular functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer of suggested actions that mediates between the complex image analysis results and the user's management needs. This intermediary translates complex automated analysis into user-friendly action suggestions, thereby achieving high automation without exposing users to system complexity, and allowing the system to remain manageable through this buffering layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If default actions are provided for all images, then user interaction is simplified, but user control over custom actions is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction simplicityVSAvoidcustom action flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts the action interface based on image content and user needs. For images with clear classifications, the system presents simplified default actions to ease operation. When images require more nuanced handling or user preferences indicate customization, the system dynamically adjusts to provide extended action options. This dynamic behavior resolves the contradiction by maintaining simplicity for common cases while preserving adaptability when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides partial automation through suggested actions that cover common image management tasks, while leaving the option for users to exceed these suggestions with custom actions when necessary. This partial action approach simplifies typical user interactions with default suggestions, while the ability to add custom actions maintains versatility. The system thus balances ease of operation with adaptability by providing sufficient default functionality without forcing it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11574470B2Suggested actions for images
Publication Date: 2023.02.07 GOOGLE LLC
  • US11574470B2 patent drawing
  • US11574470B2 patent drawing
  • US11574470B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Implementations relate to causing a command to be executed based on an image. In some implementations, a computer-implemented method includes obtaining and programmatically analyzing an image to determine suggested actions. The method causes a user interface to be displayed that includes user interface elements corresponding to default actions, and to suggested actions that are determined based on analyzing the image. The method receives user input indicative of selection of a particular action from the default actions and the suggested actions. The method causes a command to be executed by a computing device for the particular action that was selected.