Image Compositing with Geometric Verification for Torn Documents

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional image processing apparatuses face difficulties in automatically reconnecting and composing images from torn documents with non-rectangular shapes without user intervention, leading to increased operational burdens and potential errors in forming a composite image.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus and method that includes a capturing unit, storage unit, first and second determination sections, and control sections to identify and connect non-rectangular image edges, determining if the combined image is rectangular or bilaterally symmetric, and then producing a composite image automatically.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional image processing apparatuses are used to reconnect and compose images from torn documents with non-rectangular shapes, then the basic image compositing function is provided, but user intervention is required leading to increased operational burdens and potential errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational burdenVSAvoidautomatic image reconnection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-verification by automatically determining whether the outer shape of the combined image is rectangular or bilaterally symmetric, and automatically determines the presence of non-rectangular images. This self-service capability eliminates the need for user intervention in verifying image composition accuracy, thereby reducing operational burden while achieving automatic image reconnection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates a feedback mechanism where the second determination section verifies the correctness of the combined image by checking whether its outer shape is rectangular or bilaterally symmetric. This feedback loop ensures accurate automatic reconnection of torn document images without requiring user intervention, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and extent of automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If automatic image compositing is implemented without verification, then productivity is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to potential errors in forming composite images

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage compositing speedVSAvoidcomposite image accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary verification actions before finalizing the composite image output. The second determination section checks whether the outer shape of the combined image is rectangular or bilaterally symmetric, and the first determination section identifies non-rectangular images before compositing. These preliminary actions ensure accuracy while maintaining efficient automatic processing, resolving the contradiction between productivity and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The verification sections provide feedback on the accuracy of image compositing by determining geometric properties of the combined image. This feedback mechanism ensures that composite images are formed with high precision automatically, maintaining both productivity and manufacturing precision simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If verification steps are added to ensure composite image accuracy, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional determination sections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomposite image accuracyVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The verification mechanism focuses on specific local geometric properties (rectangularity and bilateral symmetry) of the combined image outer shape rather than performing comprehensive complex verification. This localized approach to quality checking ensures manufacturing precision while minimizing the increase in device complexity, as the determination sections only need to assess these specific geometric characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Adaptability or versatility

If the system handles only rectangular images, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability deteriorates as it cannot process torn documents with non-rectangular shapes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage shape handling capabilityVSAvoidprocessing logic
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed to handle asymmetric (non-rectangular) image shapes by incorporating determination sections that specifically identify and verify non-rectangular images. The first determination section detects the presence of non-rectangular images, and the second determination section verifies bilateral symmetry or rectangularity after compositing. This asymmetric handling capability provides adaptability for torn documents while keeping processing logic manageable through focused geometric property verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS10298806B2Image processing apparatus and processing method for combining multiple images with accuracy verification thereof
Publication Date: 2019.05.21 KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC
  • US10298806B2 patent drawing
  • US10298806B2 patent drawing
  • US10298806B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This image processing apparatus includes a first determination section, a first control section, a second determination section, and a second control section. If the first determination section determines that there are images whose outer shapes are not rectangular, the first control section performs control operations to connect edges of the images to combine the images. The second determination section determines whether the outer shape of the combined image, which is made of the images combined by the first control section, is rectangular or whether the combined image is bilaterally symmetric with respect to a predetermined line passing through the center of the combined image. If the second determination section determines that the outer shape of the combined image is rectangular or that the combined image is bilaterally symmetric, the second control unit performs control operations to produce a composite image of the images with the edges connected to each other.