Selective Image Compositing With Minimal 3D Geometry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Generating a complete 3D model of a physical structure for augmenting or modifying portions of it is resource-intensive and can result in lower visual fidelity due to incomplete contextual information and differences between rendering environments, leading to unrealistic modifications.

Innovation Solution

A method that uses a minimum amount of 3D geometric data, such as block or planar geometry with 3D keypoints, to represent a physical structure, combined with synthetic image data, and applies scene effects to create a photorealistic image by aligning it with the original 2D image's camera intrinsics and lighting conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a complete 3D model is generated for augmenting or modifying portions of a physical structure, then the model provides comprehensive geometric representation, but it consumes excessive processing resources and increases image rendering time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric representation accuracyVSAvoidimage rendering time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the physical structure into multiple facets, where only the selected facet is modeled with complete 3D geometry while other facets use simplified representations. This allows the system to maintain geometric accuracy for the modified portion while reducing overall processing requirements and rendering time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If a complete 3D model is generated from external image sources, then spatial data is enhanced, but visual fidelity decreases due to rendering environment differences and incomplete contextual information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial dataVSAvoidvisual fidelity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different quality levels to different parts of the model. The selected facet that requires modification receives high-quality complete 3D modeling with full contextual information, while other facets use lower-quality simplified representations. This local differentiation maintains visual fidelity where needed while reducing overall processing burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If modifications are applied to a complete 3D model, then comprehensive structural features are available, but the modifications appear unrealistic due to rendering environment differences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural feature completenessVSAvoidmodification realism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by capturing the original image with contextual information (lighting, camera intrinsics, scene effects) before generating the 3D model. This contextual data is stored and later applied to the rendered modifications, ensuring they appear realistic in the final composite image even though the 3D model itself is simplified.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250371820A1Systems and methods for selective image compositing
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 HOVER INC
  • US20250371820A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371820A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371820A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are techniques for generating a photorealistic image by augmenting or compositing at least a portion of a physical structure (e.g., a house) depicted in a two-dimensional (2D) image with synthetic image data. Additionally, disclosed are techniques for augmenting the depicted physical structure and applying a scene effect to the synthetic image data to create a photorealistic effect.