Image Compression Algorithm Selection by Frame Similarity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing technologies lack the ability to dynamically adjust compression algorithms and loss factors based on the similarity between consecutive images, leading to suboptimal compression efficiency and quality.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus and method that selects and adjusts compression algorithms and loss factors based on the similarity between previous and current images, using a plurality of algorithms and loss factors to optimize compression according to the fluctuation level, and transmits compressed images with adjustable quality in response to control signals from external terminals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single compression algorithm is used for all images, then the device complexity is reduced, but the compression efficiency and quality deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression efficiencyVSAvoidalgorithm selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects compression algorithms based on the similarity between current and reference images. When images are highly similar, a simpler algorithm is used; when they differ significantly, a more sophisticated algorithm is selected, making the system adaptive rather than static

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the compression algorithm parameter based on image similarity metrics. By calculating the difference between consecutive images and adjusting the algorithm selection accordingly, the system optimizes compression performance for different image conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If a high loss factor is used for compression, then the compression ratio is improved, but the image quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression ratioVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The loss factor is dynamically adjusted based on image similarity. For images that are very similar to the reference image, a higher loss factor is applied since the difference will be small; for dissimilar images, a lower loss factor preserves more detail

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the loss factor parameter according to the calculated image similarity. This parameter adjustment allows the system to optimize between compression ratio and quality based on the actual content being compressed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If image compression is performed without considering similarity, then the processing speed is maintained, but the compression efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs a preliminary similarity assessment between the current image and reference image before applying compression. This preliminary step allows the system to choose the most efficient compression path, avoiding unnecessary complex processing for similar images

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2599307B1Image processing apparatus and method
Publication Date: 2019.05.22 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • EP2599307B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2599307B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2599307B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

An image processing apparatus and method capable of compressing a current image using one of a plurality of compression algorithms based upon similarity (or fluctuation level) between a previous image and the current image are discussed.