Image Cropping Suggestion System Using Composition Quality Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional image cropping techniques are time-consuming and often result in visually unpleasing images, especially for users unfamiliar with photography rules or lacking a good 'eye' for composition, leading to suboptimal cropping outcomes.

Innovation Solution

An image cropping suggestion system that scores candidate croppings based on parameters such as composition quality, content preservation, and boundary simplicity, using machine-learning techniques to analyze visually pleasing images and suggest the most effective croppings to users through a user interface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual cropping is performed by users unfamiliar with photography rules, then the cropping process is simple and quick, but the visual quality and composition of the cropped image deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of croppingVSAvoidcomposition quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically performing the cropping operation based on pre-established visual characteristics and photography rules. The machine learning model analyzes the original image and autonomously determines the optimal cropping region, eliminating the need for user expertise while maintaining high composition quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual cropping process with an automated machine learning-based system. The machine learning model substitutes human judgment and manual selection with algorithmic analysis of visual characteristics, achieving both ease of operation and high composition quality simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple photos are manually cropped to improve selection, then the composition quality may improve, but the time required for processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomposition qualityVSAvoidtime for cropping
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-calculating and pre-selecting the optimal cropping regions based on machine learning analysis of visual characteristics. Instead of requiring users to manually review multiple crops, the system has already identified and prepared the best cropping options, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining high composition quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces time-consuming manual review and selection of multiple cropped photos with automated machine learning-based selection. The system efficiently identifies and presents the best cropping options algorithmically, eliminating the need for users to manually evaluate multiple candidates and substantially reducing the time required for the cropping process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If automated cropping algorithms are used, then the composition quality improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomposition qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses copying by leveraging pre-trained machine learning models that have learned optimal cropping patterns from extensive training data. Instead of implementing complex real-time analysis algorithms, the system copies and applies pre-established visual characteristics and cropping rules, simplifying the actual execution while maintaining high composition quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by adjusting the output parameters of the machine learning model to match different photography styles and requirements. The system can modify cropping parameters such as aspect ratio, composition style, and visual characteristics to suit various needs, achieving high composition quality through parameter optimization rather than system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9245347B2Image Cropping suggestion
Publication Date: 2016.01.26 ADOBE INC
  • US9245347B2 patent drawing
  • US9245347B2 patent drawing
  • US9245347B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Image cropping suggestion is described. In one or more implementations, multiple croppings of a scene are scored based on parameters that indicate visual characteristics established for visually pleasing croppings. The parameters may include a parameter that indicates composition quality of a candidate cropping, for example. The parameters may also include a parameter that indicates whether content appearing in the scene is preserved and a parameter that indicates simplicity of a boundary of a candidate cropping. Based on the scores, image croppings may be chosen, e.g., to present the chosen image croppings to a user for selection. To choose the croppings, they may be ranked according to the score and chosen such that consecutively ranked croppings are not chosen. Alternately or in addition, image croppings may be chosen that are visually different according to scores which indicate those croppings have different visual characteristics.