Image Defect Cause Detection Using Feature Image Recognition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining the cause of image defects in image forming devices face challenges such as high computational demands and the need for extensive training data, leading to inaccurate or omitted determinations.

Innovation Solution

An image processing method that generates feature images from a test image using a processor, followed by pattern recognition to identify the cause of defects, reducing computational load while maintaining accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If pattern recognition process is executed on the entire test image to accurately determine the cause of image defects, then determination accuracy is improved, but computational load becomes excessively large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetermination accuracyVSAvoidcomputational load
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The test image is divided into multiple regions of interest (ROIs) based on detected defect positions and types. Pattern recognition is then executed only on these specific ROIs rather than the entire image, significantly reducing computational load while maintaining determination accuracy for the defective areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different processing approaches are applied to different regions of the image. High-accuracy pattern recognition is concentrated on defect-containing ROIs, while other areas receive minimal or no processing, optimizing the balance between accuracy and computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Power

If threshold-based parameter comparison is used to determine image defect causes, then computational load is reduced, but determination accuracy decreases due to omission or erroneous determination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational loadVSAvoiddetermination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of applying full pattern recognition to the entire image (excessive action), the system applies it only to necessary regions (partial action). This selective approach maintains sufficient determination accuracy while avoiding the computational burden of processing the complete image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If enormous amount of training data is prepared to increase determination accuracy, then accuracy is improved, but time and effort required for data preparation increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetermination accuracyVSAvoiddata preparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The training data requirement is segmented by focusing on specific defect types and their corresponding image regions. Instead of requiring comprehensive training data for all possible image conditions, the system trains on targeted datasets relevant to specific defect scenarios, reducing overall data preparation time while maintaining accuracy for those defect types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12393378B2Image processing method and image processing apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.08.19 KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC
  • US12393378B2 patent drawing
  • US12393378B2 patent drawing
  • US12393378B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An object of the present invention is to determine the cause of an image defect that occurs in an image forming device with high accuracy while suppressing the amount of calculation at a processor. A processor (80) determines the cause of an image defect on the basis of a test image read from an output sheet of an image forming device (2). The processor (80) generates a plurality of feature images by executing a feature extraction process on the test image. Further, the processor (80) uses each of the plurality of feature images as an input image and determines which of a plurality of cause candidates corresponding to the image defect the input image corresponds to by pattern recognition of the input image.