Image Subject Detection Scheduling for High-Frequency Live View Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing systems struggle to detect and track specific subjects with high frequency, leading to inefficiencies in updating detection frames and handling subject changes during live view image display.

Innovation Solution

A processing apparatus and method that incorporates both subject detection and tracking processes, allowing for repeated first and second detection processing at specific intervals, enhancing the frequency of subject detection and enabling high-frequency updates of detection frames.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If subject detection processing is performed at every frame, then detection frequency is improved, but processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection frequencyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic subject detection processing where detection is performed at specific intervals (every N frames) rather than continuously at every frame. This periodic approach maintains adequate detection frequency for tracking purposes while significantly reducing the overall computational load and processing time required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary subject detection at lower frequency to establish initial tracking parameters, then uses these preliminary results to guide subsequent higher-frequency detection only when necessary. This preliminary action reduces unnecessary processing by preparing the system in advance for when detailed detection is needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of time

If subject detection processing is performed at low frequency, then processing time is reduced, but detection frequency and tracking accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing timeVSAvoiddetection frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of detection frequency based on subject motion characteristics. When the subject is detected to be moving rapidly or changing position significantly, the system automatically increases detection frequency to maintain tracking accuracy. When the subject is stationary or moving slowly, detection frequency is reduced to save processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors tracking quality and subject motion patterns, using this feedback to adjust detection frequency in real-time. When tracking accuracy deteriorates or subject motion increases, feedback triggers increased detection frequency. When tracking is stable, feedback reduces detection frequency to optimize processing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If detection processing is performed frequently, then subject tracking accuracy is improved, but device complexity and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides subject detection processing into multiple stages or segments: initial detection phase, tracking phase, and verification phase. Each segment performs specific detection tasks with appropriate frequency and complexity levels, rather than performing full detection processing at every frame. This segmentation maintains tracking accuracy while reducing overall computational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes detection parameters such as search window size, detection threshold, and processing intensity based on current tracking conditions. When tracking is stable, parameters are adjusted to reduce processing complexity. When tracking accuracy needs improvement or subject motion increases, parameters are changed to enhance detection performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12567154B2Processing apparatus, method, and medium for high-frequency specific subject processing in image data
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 FUJIFILM CORP
  • US12567154B2 patent drawing
  • US12567154B2 patent drawing
  • US12567154B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A processing apparatus includes a processor and a memory. The processor performs first detection processing of detecting a first area of a target to be detected from image data acquired from an imaging element and performs second detection processing of detecting a second area based on the first area from image data acquired from the imaging element. The processor further performs first processing using the first area, and performs second processing using the second area. The processor repeatedly performs the first detection processing, and performs the second detection processing in each period from the detecting of the first area started at a first timing to the detecting of the first area subsequently started after the first timing.