Image Dynamic Range Compensation via Coefficient Modulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Image processing devices using the Retinex theory face challenges with large circuit size and complexity due to the need for algebraic functions, exponential functions, and division operations, which can lead to increased noise and degradation in display quality, especially when modulating both illumination and reflectance components.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves an image processing device that reduces circuit size by using illumination and contrast enhancement coefficients to modulate the reflection-absorption component, eliminating the need for division and algebraic functions, and incorporates noise suppression and pattern style intensity control to enhance image quality without excessive enhancement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If algebraic functions, exponential functions, and division operations are used to modulate illumination and reflectance components according to Retinex theory, then image processing accuracy is improved, but circuit size and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage processing accuracyVSAvoidcircuit size and complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the complex Retinex theory calculations into a simplified parameter-based approach. Instead of using algebraic functions, exponential functions, and division operations, the invention uses pre-calculated enhancement coefficients (K1, K2, K3) that depend only on the illumination component. This parameter transformation maintains image processing accuracy while dramatically reducing circuit complexity by eliminating complex mathematical operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and separates the complex mathematical operations from the real-time processing path. By pre-calculating the enhancement coefficients based only on the illumination component and storing them for lookup during image processing, the invention removes the need for complex algebraic and exponential calculations from the critical processing path, thereby reducing circuit size while maintaining processing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Manufacturing precision

If complex mathematical operations are performed for dynamic range compensation, then image quality improvement is achieved, but noise increases and display quality degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidnoise and display quality degradation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the computational parameters from complex mathematical operations to simple coefficient-based scaling. By using pre-determined enhancement coefficients that are applied through simple multiplication operations, the invention maintains image quality improvement while avoiding the noise amplification and numerical instability that occur with complex algebraic and exponential operations in low-light regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses simple, computationally inexpensive operations (multiplication and addition) instead of expensive complex mathematical operations. The enhancement coefficients are calculated once and reused for multiple pixels, reducing computational burden and minimizing the introduction of numerical noise, thereby preserving display quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Measurement precision

If both illumination and reflectance components are modulated according to Retinex theory, then local dynamic range compensation is improved, but circuit complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocal dynamic range compensationVSAvoidcircuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the reflectance component modulation from the real-time processing path and replaces it with a simplified approach. Instead of independently modulating both illumination and reflectance components using complex Retinex calculations, the invention modulates only the illumination component using pre-calculated coefficients, while the reflectance component is recovered through simple subtraction, thereby maintaining local dynamic range compensation effectiveness while reducing circuit complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS9866761B2Image dynamic range compensation device and method
Publication Date: 2018.01.09 SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO LTD
  • US9866761B2 patent drawing
  • US9866761B2 patent drawing
  • US9866761B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is an image processing device including an obtaining unit configured to obtain image data, a first modulator that multiplies a first coefficient by a reflection-absorption component, which is based on a difference between a pixel value of a pixel of interest among the image data and an illumination component of the pixel of interest, to modulate the reflection-absorption component, a second modulator that multiplies a second coefficient by the illumination component to modulate the illumination component, and an adding unit that adds the reflection-absorption component after modulation to the illumination component after modulation.