Image Edit History Copy and Append Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image editing systems cannot efficiently copy and apply edit histories from one image to another without overwriting existing edit histories, limiting user convenience when multiple images require similar edits.

Innovation Solution

An electronic apparatus with a copy unit to copy image processing history data, a reception unit to receive instructions for appending or overwriting edit histories, and a storage unit to manage edit histories, allowing users to switch between overwriting and adding edit histories based on user instructions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If edit history is copied and overwritten to apply the same edits to multiple images, then productivity is improved by reducing repetitive adjustments, but existing edit history on the target image is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of applying edits to multiple imagesVSAvoidloss of existing edit history
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the state parameter of the edit history data by providing multiple modes (overwrite mode and add mode). Users can switch between these modes to determine whether to replace or preserve existing edit history, thus resolving the contradiction between productivity improvement and information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system makes the edit history management dynamic by allowing users to switch between overwrite and add modes based on their needs. This dynamic flexibility enables the system to adapt to different scenarios: using overwrite mode when productivity is prioritized and add mode when preserving existing edit history is important.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of information

If edit history is appended to preserve existing records, then loss of information is reduced, but device complexity increases due to multiple management modes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreservation of existing edit historyVSAvoidcomplexity of edit history management system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system manages complexity by parameterizing the operation mode (overwrite vs. add) rather than creating separate complex systems for each scenario. This single parameter change approach simplifies the overall system architecture while still providing the needed functionality to preserve or replace edit history.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system supports both overwrite and add modes, then adaptability is improved by accommodating different user needs, but ease of operation decreases due to additional mode selection steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in edit history managementVSAvoidsimplicity of applying edit history
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by setting a default mode (overwrite mode) for applying edit history. This default setting allows users to quickly apply edits without needing to select a mode, maintaining ease of operation for the most common scenario. Users can switch to add mode only when they specifically need to preserve existing edit history, thus minimizing the impact on ease of operation while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11269948B2Electronic apparatus, method for controlling electronic apparatus, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2022.03.08 CANON KK
  • US11269948B2 patent drawing
  • US11269948B2 patent drawing
  • US11269948B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic apparatus is provided and copies first history data indicating a content of image processing performed on a first image. In response to an instruction to append the copied first history data to a second image received, the electronic apparatus overwrites the second history data with the copied first history data and saves the copied first history data if a result of image processing performed on the second image using second history data is displayed on a first screen. The electronic apparatus adds the copied first history data and saves the copied first history data in association with the second image if a plurality of pieces of information corresponding to each of a plurality of second images is displayed on a second screen.