Image Evaluation Models Using Neural Feature Weighting and PCA

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems struggle to efficiently identify and categorize images based on similarity and uniqueness, particularly in large datasets, without relying on manual evaluation, and fail to account for nuanced human perception of image features.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for image evaluation using machine learning techniques to extract features from images, construct generative models, and apply regression algorithms to determine similarity and uniqueness scores, reducing dimensionality through methods like PCA, and utilizing neural networks for object and scene detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual evaluation methods are used to identify and categorize images, then accuracy in understanding human perception of image features is improved, but productivity and efficiency deteriorate due to the time-consuming nature of manual processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy in understanding human perceptionVSAvoidefficiency in image evaluation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated image evaluation where the computational model independently performs feature extraction, similarity detection, and categorization without requiring manual human intervention for each image evaluation task

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual human evaluation processes with an automated computational system using machine learning models, neural networks, and regression algorithms to perform image feature analysis and similarity detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If traditional image comparison methods are used, then simplicity of the system is maintained, but measurement precision and accuracy in detecting image similarity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy in similarity detectionVSAvoidcomplexity of evaluation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the image evaluation process into distinct functional modules: feature extraction module, dimensionality reduction module, generative model construction module, and similarity detection module, allowing each to be optimized independently while maintaining overall system accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms image data from pixel space to feature space through neural network extraction and further reduces dimensions using PCA, creating a compressed representation that captures essential similarity characteristics while reducing computational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Loss of information

If high-dimensional feature representations are used, then completeness of image feature information is improved, but computational intensity and processing time worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of feature informationVSAvoidcomputational intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the most relevant and discriminative features from images using neural networks, eliminating redundant pixel-level data while preserving essential semantic information needed for similarity detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dimensionality reduction techniques including PCA to transform high-dimensional feature vectors into lower-dimensional representations that retain the most significant variance and information content, reducing computational load while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250225204A1Systems, methods, and storage media for training a model for image evaluation
Publication Date: 2025.07.10 VIZIT LABS INC
  • US20250225204A1 patent drawing
  • US20250225204A1 patent drawing
  • US20250225204A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method may include executing a neural network to extract a first plurality of features from a plurality of first training images and a second plurality of features from a second training image; generating a model comprising a first image performance score for each of the plurality of first training images and a feature weight for each feature, the feature weight for each feature of the first plurality of features calculated based on an impact of a variation in the feature on first image performance scores of the plurality of first training images; training the model by adjusting the impact of a variation of each of a first set of features that correspond to the second plurality of features; executing the model using a third set of features from a candidate image to generate a candidate image performance score; and generating a record identifying the candidate image performance score.