Image Evaluation Device for Multi-Face Subjective Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image evaluation methods fail to accurately reflect subjective viewer evaluations and do not effectively handle images containing multiple faces, as they rely on quantitative calculations rather than user-centric assessments.

Innovation Solution

An image evaluation device and method that acquires and statistically calculates individual evaluation values for various face-related information such as number, size, position, orientation, and detection score, using evaluation tables based on user-selected samples to provide a more subjective and accurate evaluation, including positional relationships and front face ratios for multiple faces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If image evaluation is performed using quantitative calculation methods (evaluation values for lightness, face ratio, orientation, etc.), then the evaluation process is objective and systematic, but the results do not reflect subjective evaluation by actual viewers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidsubjective viewer preference
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by collecting actual viewer evaluation results for training images and using this feedback to train the neural network. The system continuously improves its evaluation accuracy by incorporating real human judgment data, allowing the quantitative evaluation to better reflect subjective viewer preferences while maintaining systematic processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical calculation methods (summing evaluation values for lightness, face ratio, orientation) with a neural network-based system. This substitution allows the system to learn complex patterns from training data and produce evaluation results that better match subjective viewer preferences without sacrificing the objectivity and systematic nature of automated evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If simple evaluation value calculation is used for images with multiple faces, then the processing is simple and fast, but appropriate evaluation of images containing more than one face is not provided

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidevaluation accuracy for multi-face images
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the evaluation process adaptive to the number of faces in the image. The neural network dynamically adjusts its evaluation based on the detected number of faces, using different evaluation criteria and weighting for single-face versus multi-face images. This allows the system to maintain processing speed while improving evaluation accuracy for multi-face images through context-aware adaptation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive evaluation of multiple face attributes (number, size, position, orientation, rotational angle, detection score) is performed, then the evaluation is thorough and detailed, but the complexity of the evaluation system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation comprehensivenessVSAvoidevaluation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the evaluation process into distinct functional modules: face detection module, attribute extraction module (for number, size, position, orientation, rotational angle, detection score), neural network evaluation module, and result output module. This segmentation allows comprehensive evaluation of multiple attributes while managing system complexity through modular design, where each module handles a specific aspect of the evaluation independently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8457365B2Device, method and computer readable recording medium containing program for evaluating image
Publication Date: 2013.06.04 FUJIFILM CORP
  • US8457365B2 patent drawing
  • US8457365B2 patent drawing
  • US8457365B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image evaluation device includes: an information acquiring unit to acquire, from an image containing at least one face, at least one type of information including at least the number of the at least one face and optionally including any of a size of the face, a position of the face in the image, an orientation of the face, a rotational angle of the face and a detection score of the face; and an individual evaluation value calculating unit to statistically calculate an individual evaluation value indicating a result of evaluation for each type of information based on the acquired information.