Image Feature Classification for Low-Sample Defect Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge in camera module production is the low accuracy and efficiency of deep learning-based target detection due to insufficient samples for model training, particularly for defects like solder overflow and pin bending, which are difficult to obtain given the routine yield control and production line optimization.

Innovation Solution

A data detection method that involves obtaining image samples, extracting sample features, determining a target sample feature with the maximum nearest-neighbor feature distance, and training an initial feature classification model based on (N+1) sample feature categories to improve detection accuracy and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If deep learning-based target detection is used, then detection capability is improved, but sample sufficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidsample quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent generates synthetic defect samples by copying and transforming normal connector images through artificial defect introduction. This creates virtual defective samples without requiring physical defective products, thus resolving the contradiction between needing sufficient training samples and the scarcity of actual defect occurrences in optimized production lines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms normal images into defective samples by changing parameters such as introducing solder overflow, pin bending, or pin missing conditions through image processing. This parameter transformation allows generation of diverse defect samples from limited normal samples, improving detection capability without requiring abundant physical defect samples.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If more samples are collected for model training, then model robustness is improved, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel robustnessVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-generating a comprehensive dataset of synthetic defective samples before actual detection tasks. This pre-generated dataset can be stored and reused for multiple training iterations, avoiding repeated time-consuming data collection and processing while maintaining model robustness through diverse synthetic samples.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

By copying normal samples and transforming them into various defect types through systematic image processing, the patent creates large volumes of training data quickly without the time cost of collecting actual defective samples from production lines, thus improving model robustness efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional defect grouping method is used, then detection coverage is improved, but data collection complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoiddata collection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of the traditional approach of collecting different defect types separately and grouping them, the patent inverts the process by starting with normal samples and systematically transforming them into various defect types through controlled image manipulation. This simplifies data collection by requiring only normal samples while achieving comprehensive defect coverage through transformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes normal connector images serve multiple functions by transforming them into various defect types (solder overflow, pin bending, pin missing, etc.). This multi-functionality approach allows a single set of normal samples to generate comprehensive training data for multiple defect categories, reducing data collection complexity while maintaining broad detection coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260004564A1Data detection method and apparatus, computer, storage medium, and program product
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 TENCENT TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO LTD
  • US20260004564A1 patent drawing
  • US20260004564A1 patent drawing
  • US20260004564A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A data detection method includes obtaining an image sample, extracting sample features from the image sample, determining a target sample feature with a maximum nearest-neighbor feature distance, determining, based on the nearest-neighbor feature distances of the sample features, (N+1) sample feature categories corresponding to the sample features, N being a positive integer, and training an initial feature classification model based on the (N+1) sample feature categories and the sample features to obtain a trained feature classification model. The nearest-neighbor feature distance of one sample feature is a minimum value of feature distances between the one sample feature and other ones of the plurality of sample features except the one sample feature. The (N+1) sample feature categories include N first feature categories indicating detected data being normal data and a second feature category indicating to perform secondary detection on the detected data.