Image Forming Apparatus Adaptive Adjustment Controller

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Image forming apparatuses face challenges in maintaining optimal image quality due to variations in density balance, color misregistration, and environmental changes, leading to unnecessary adjustments that disrupt high-speed image output.

Innovation Solution

An image forming apparatus with a controller that assesses internal conditions and factor statuses to determine the necessity and priority of adjustments, allowing for immediate or scheduled adjustments based on user-established conditions to ensure image quality without unnecessary frequency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If adjustments are performed frequently to maintain image quality, then image quality consistency is improved, but output speed and productivity deteriorate due to unnecessary adjustments disrupting high-speed image output

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality consistencyVSAvoidoutput speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of adjustment frequency dynamically based on detected conditions. Instead of performing adjustments at fixed intervals, the controller monitors factors such as elapsed time, sheet count, cartridge replacement status, and environmental conditions to adaptively adjust the frequency of image formation condition corrections, thereby avoiding unnecessary adjustments while maintaining image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The image forming apparatus performs self-diagnosis and self-adjustment by automatically detecting its own operational state and environmental conditions. The controller monitors internal parameters (elapsed time, sheet count, cartridge status) and externally performs density measurements, then autonomously determines whether adjustments are necessary and executes them only when needed, eliminating the need for external intervention or fixed-schedule maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If adjustments are delayed to maintain high-speed output, then productivity is improved, but image quality deteriorates due to density balance variations and color misregistration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput speedVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the controller continuously monitors operational parameters (elapsed time, sheet count, cartridge replacement) and environmental conditions (temperature, humidity), performs density measurements on transferred images, and uses this feedback information to determine when adjustments are necessary. This closed-loop control ensures adjustments are made at optimal moments to maintain image quality without unnecessarily interrupting production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The controller performs preliminary assessment of adjustment necessity by monitoring operational conditions and environmental factors before actual image formation issues occur. By detecting changes in temperature, humidity, cartridge status, and usage patterns in advance, the system can proactively schedule adjustments at optimal times, preventing image quality degradation while minimizing production disruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If the system monitors multiple factors (elapsed time, sheet count, environmental conditions) to determine adjustment necessity, then adjustment timing accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustment timing accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller serves multiple functions: it manages the image formation process, monitors operational parameters (elapsed time, sheet count, cartridge status), detects environmental conditions (temperature, humidity), performs density measurements, and executes adjustments. By consolidating these diverse functions into a single multi-functional controller, the system achieves precise adjustment timing without proportionally increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges the monitoring of multiple independent factors (time-based counters, sheet count trackers, environmental sensors, density measurement capabilities) into a unified control architecture. The controller integrates these various data streams and processes them collectively to make adjustment decisions, reducing the complexity that would arise from having separate dedicated systems for each monitoring function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures consistent image quality by optimizing adjustments according to user-defined priorities, reducing unnecessary adjustments and maintaining high-speed output.

Implementation Method 1

The electrostatic latent image on the image bearing member is developed with a toner to form a toner image

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic attraction: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 2

The toner image on the recording material is then applied with heat and pressure and fixed onto the recording material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS7424239B2Image forming apparatus having a function of adjusting an image formation condition
Publication Date: 2008.09.09 CANON KK
  • US7424239B2 patent drawing
  • US7424239B2 patent drawing
  • US7424239B2 patent drawing

AI summary

To provide an image forming apparatus and a control method for the same, with which an adjustment for satisfying an image quality is performed without fail while an execution frequency of the adjustment can be changed, for example, an unnecessary adjustment can be skipped. The image forming apparatus includes: a controller for issuing a plurality of commands; an engine for executing image formation according to the command; a control portion for holding a condition status indicating an internal condition of the engine and a factor status indicating a factor of the condition status, or the factor status and notifying, in response to the command, the condition status and the factor status, or the factor status; and a judgement unit for judging whether to adjust an image formation condition of the engine or not according to the condition status and the factor status, or the factor status.