Image Forming Control Apparatus User Permission Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image forming systems lack effective user permission management, particularly in controlling access to processes based on timing conditions, leading to potential unauthorized execution of image formation tasks.

Innovation Solution

A control apparatus with a storage unit that classifies processes by timing conditions and a reception unit that receives instructions, utilizing a restriction unit to ensure only permitted processes are executed by specifying categories and restricting access based on user permissions stored in a permission table.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If user permission management for processes is not implemented, then ease of operation is maintained, but security and control are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidpermission management system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments processes into different categories (first category and second category) based on timing conditions, and implements differentiated permission management for each category. This allows selective control over process execution without managing permissions for every individual process, resolving the contradiction between security and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-establishes a permission table that defines which users can execute processes in each category before actual process execution occurs. This preliminary permission setup enables automated access control during operation, maintaining security while reducing the complexity of real-time permission decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If processes are classified by timing conditions with permission restrictions, then security is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess controlVSAvoidprocess classification system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Processes are segmented into two categories based on timing conditions: first category processes execute according to instructions received, while second category processes execute according to predetermined timing. This segmentation enables simplified permission management where the permission table only needs to specify which category each user can access, rather than managing complex individual process permissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of process classification from individual process identification to category-based timing conditions. By defining categories based on execution timing (immediate execution vs. predetermined timing), the system reduces the complexity of permission management while maintaining comprehensive access control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If permission table is established for each user and process category, then access control precision is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepermission accuracyVSAvoidpermission table structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The permission table is segmented to store only essential permission information: user identification and the category of processes they can execute (first or second category). This segmented approach provides precise access control by category rather than requiring detailed permissions for each individual process, maintaining accuracy while reducing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If restriction unit checks permission table for each process instruction, then security is enhanced, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthorization verificationVSAvoidprocess execution time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The restriction unit segments the permission verification process by checking only the category of the requested process against the user's permitted category in the permission table, rather than verifying each individual process instruction. This segmented verification approach maintains security while significantly reducing the time required for authorization checks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Permission verification is performed as a preliminary check before process execution by comparing the process category with the user's authorized category in the pre-established permission table. This preliminary category-based verification ensures security while minimizing processing time loss compared to detailed process-by-process authorization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10284539B2Control apparatus, image forming apparatus, and non-transitory computer readable medium that controls execution of a process
Publication Date: 2019.05.07 FUJIFILM BUSINESS INNOVATION CORP
  • US10284539B2 patent drawing
  • US10284539B2 patent drawing
  • US10284539B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control apparatus includes a storage unit, a reception unit, and a restriction unit. The storage unit stores, for each of categories of processes classified in accordance with a condition related to a timing of a process, whether or not it is possible for each user to use processes that belong to the category. The reception unit receives an instruction for a process. The restriction unit specifies a category to which the process indicated in the instruction received by the reception unit belongs. In a case where use of processes that belong to the specified category is not permitted for a user that provided the instruction in the storage unit, the restriction unit restricts execution of the process according to the instruction.