Image Forming Apparatus Controller for Defective Label Cutting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image forming apparatuses lack an efficient method to determine and prevent defective images from being cut, leading to wasted resources and manual labor in separating defective and non-defective label members.

Innovation Solution

An image forming apparatus with a transport unit, image forming unit, pasting unit, inspection unit, and cutting unit, where the controller determines if an image is defective before allowing the cutting unit to form a cut, ensuring only non-defective images are clipped and processed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the cutting unit performs cutting operation on all label members, then continuous production is maintained, but defective images are wasted and manual separation is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous productionVSAvoidwaste of defective images
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection unit performs image quality inspection before the cutting unit executes the cutting operation. This preliminary inspection allows the system to identify defective images in advance and prevent cutting of defective label members, thereby avoiding waste while maintaining continuous production flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The controller receives inspection results from the inspection unit and uses this feedback information to control the cutting unit. When a defective image is detected, the controller sends a signal to skip the cutting operation for that specific label member, enabling dynamic adjustment of the cutting process based on real-time quality feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of substance

If the cutting unit skips cutting on defective images, then waste is reduced, but additional inspection equipment and control complexity are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereduction of defective wasteVSAvoidinspection and control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection unit serves multiple functions: it inspects image quality, provides feedback to the controller, and enables the cutting unit to make decisions about whether to cut. This multi-functional design reduces the need for separate dedicated inspection and control systems, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-inspection and self-control through the integrated inspection unit and controller. The apparatus automatically identifies defective images and adjusts cutting operations without requiring external manual intervention or complex external control systems, thereby reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If manual separation of defective and non-defective labels is performed, then cutting accuracy is maintained, but manual labor and processing time are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting accuracyVSAvoidmanual labor requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The manual mechanical separation process is replaced by an automated optical inspection system combined with electronic control. The inspection unit detects image quality automatically, and the controller manages the cutting unit to skip defective items, eliminating the need for manual separation while maintaining cutting accuracy through precise automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary between the inspection unit and the cutting unit. It receives inspection data, processes the quality information, and sends appropriate control signals to the cutting unit, thereby automating the decision-making process that previously required manual judgment and separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Loss of substance

If inspection is performed before cutting, then defective images are identified and waste is reduced, but production time and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefective image waste reductionVSAvoidinspection process time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection unit operates continuously alongside the cutting unit, inspecting images in real-time as they pass through the system. This continuous inspection approach eliminates the need for batch inspection or stopping production, thereby minimizing the time penalty while maintaining the ability to identify and skip defective images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS9584683B2Image forming apparatus with rotational cutter and cut forming apparatus
Publication Date: 2017.02.28 FUJIFILM BUSINESS INNOVATION CORP
  • US9584683B2 patent drawing
  • US9584683B2 patent drawing
  • US9584683B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image forming apparatus includes a transport unit that transports a continuous medium; an image forming unit that forms an image on a surface of the medium; a pasting unit that pastes a protection member to the surface of the medium on which the image has been formed; an inspection unit disposed downstream of the image forming unit in a direction in which the medium is transported, the inspection unit inspecting whether the image is defective; a cutting unit disposed downstream of the inspection unit in the direction, the cutting unit being capable of performing an operation of forming a cut in the protection member and the medium so as to surround the image; and a controller that controls the cutting unit so that the cutting unit does not perform the operation of forming a cut in the protection member and the medium if the image is defective.