Image Forming Apparatus Automatic Density Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional electrophotographic image forming apparatuses face challenges in maintaining consistent image density and gradation characteristics due to variations in temperature, humidity, and the accumulation of image forming sheets, especially when components like the photosensitive drum, charging unit, or developing unit are exchanged, leading to potential deviations in output image density and gradation.

Innovation Solution

An image forming apparatus that automatically adjusts image forming conditions by detecting the mounting of new units and executing a second control process to adjust contrast potential and gamma look-up table (γLUT) settings based on density detection results, ensuring optimal image formation without user intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual image density control is executed after component exchange, then image quality is improved, but user operation complexity increases and time is consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage density consistencyVSAvoiduser operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The image forming apparatus automatically detects component exchange through mounting detection devices and autonomously executes the second control process to adjust contrast potential and generate γLUT, eliminating the need for manual user operation while maintaining image quality consistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection of component mounting status and automatically executes control adjustments before actual image formation begins, ensuring image quality is optimized in advance without requiring user intervention during operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If manual image density control is executed after component exchange, then image quality is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage density consistencyVSAvoidcontrol process time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically executes the second control process immediately upon detecting component exchange, performing all necessary adjustments for contrast potential and γLUT generation before actual image formation begins, thereby eliminating time loss without requiring manual user operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses density detection results from reading devices to automatically adjust image forming conditions through feedback control, enabling rapid autonomous optimization of image density without manual intervention delays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If component exchange is allowed during maintenance, then device adaptability is improved, but image density consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent exchange capabilityVSAvoidimage density consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Mounting detection devices detect when components are exchanged and trigger automatic execution of the second control process, which uses density detection feedback to adjust contrast potential and generate appropriate γLUT, thereby automatically restoring image density consistency after component exchange

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary automatic control adjustments immediately upon detecting component mounting, ensuring image density consistency is restored before actual image formation begins, eliminating the need for manual post-exchange calibration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Manufacturing precision

If automatic control adjustment is executed after component exchange, then image density consistency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage density consistencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mounting detection devices and control mechanisms serve multiple functions: detecting component exchange, triggering control processes, and coordinating with existing image formation systems, thereby reducing the need for separate dedicated components and minimizing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The automatic control adjustment system is integrated with the existing image forming apparatus control structure, merging the second control process with the γLUT generation and contrast potential control functions already present in the system, thereby avoiding significant complexity increase

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution ensures consistent image density and gradation characteristics by automatically adjusting image forming conditions post-component exchange, reducing the risk of deviations and improving image quality without the need for manual user operations.

Implementation Method 1

a charging unit configured to charge the image carrier

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic charge: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 2

an exposure unit configured to form an electrostatic latent image by exposing the image carrier charged by the charging unit based on image data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 3

a developing unit configured to develop the electrostatic latent image with a toner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic deposition: Electrostatic Deposition

Data Source

PatentUS8358946B2Image forming apparatus
Publication Date: 2013.01.22 CANON KK
  • US8358946B2 patent drawing
  • US8358946B2 patent drawing
  • US8358946B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image forming apparatus includes a first reading device which reads a reference image formed on a sheet, a second reading device which reads a reference image formed on an image carrier, a control device which can execute a first control process for adjusting image formation conditions based on a density of the reference image acquired from a read result of the first reading device, and a second control process for adjusting the image formation conditions based on a density of the reference image acquired from a read result of the second reading device, wherein the control device executes the second control process before performing image formation based on the image data when the first control process has not been executed in a period from when mounting of the unit configuring the image forming device is detected to when image formation is performed.