Image Forming System User Operation Sound Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image forming apparatuses do not adequately consider user operations, such as opening/closing of covers and insertion/pulling of trays, which can lead to abnormal sounds and increased risks of failures and poor quality, as these operations can exceed the durability of the apparatus and affect the lifespan of components.

Innovation Solution

An image forming system that includes a first variable mechanism, a detection unit to monitor state changes, and a sound collection unit to generate statistical information on sound waves during user operations, allowing for the evaluation of user interaction and potential risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If sound caused by user operations is not considered in making a determination, then the determination method is simple, but the evaluation of risks of abnormalities is inaccurate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracy of abnormality risksVSAvoidcomplexity of determination system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sound detection is segmented into two distinct processes: (1) detection of operation sounds during user operations using a sound collection unit, and (2) detection of abnormal sounds during image forming operations using a microphone. This segmentation allows each detection process to be optimized independently, improving overall measurement precision without excessively increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit acts as an intermediary that manages the sound collection unit and processes sound data. It determines whether collected sounds are operation sounds or abnormal sounds, and generates appropriate statistical information. This intermediary role enables accurate risk evaluation while keeping the determination logic centralized and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If user operations are monitored with detailed sound analysis, then the risk evaluation is accurate, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of apparatus operationVSAvoidcomplexity of monitoring system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sound collection unit dynamically adjusts its operation based on detected states. When a user operation is detected (via state changes in variable mechanisms), the sound collection unit activates to collect operation sounds. During normal image forming operations, the microphone monitors for abnormal sounds. This dynamic operation improves reliability while avoiding continuous high-level monitoring that would increase complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from state detection units that monitor variable mechanisms. When these detectors recognize state changes indicating user operations, they trigger the sound collection process. This feedback mechanism ensures reliable detection of user operations and their associated sounds without requiring complex continuous monitoring of all system states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If statistical information on sound waves is generated during user operations, then user operation appropriateness can be evaluated, but the processing load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completeness on user operationsVSAvoidprocessing energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates statistical information about operation sounds in advance, during the actual user operation. The control unit collects sound data and generates statistical information (such as sound level distributions) while the operation is occurring, rather than requiring post-processing analysis. This preliminary action ensures complete information capture while distributing processing load over time, reducing peak energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively evaluates the appropriateness of user operations by analyzing sound wave data, reducing the risk of failures and maintaining image quality by prompting users to operate with appropriate forces, thus extending the lifespan of components.

Implementation Method 1

a sound collection unit configured to collect sound waves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic detection: Sound

Data Source

PatentUS11514283B2Image forming system
Publication Date: 2022.11.29 CANON KK
  • US11514283B2 patent drawing
  • US11514283B2 patent drawing
  • US11514283B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided an image forming system that includes an image forming apparatus including, a first variable mechanism that varies from a first state to a second state or from the second state to the first state when physically operated by a user, a first detection unit configured to detect the variation of a state of the first variable mechanism, and a sound collection unit. The image forming system further includes a generation unit configured to generate, when the variation is detected by the first detection unit, first statistical information regarding at least one sound wave obtained by the sound collection unit in a period based on a timing when the variation is detected.