Single-Pass Image Frame CRC Validation With SIMD Parallelism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional processing systems face significant mismatches in processing speed and data transfer speed, leading to reduced system performance and inability to handle complex computational processes like image processing or graphics processing efficiently.

Innovation Solution

A computer architecture that enables parallel processing of image frame and line data using SIMD parallelism, allowing for the generation of error correction codes like CRC in a single pass, utilizing a system-on-chip (SoC) with multiple processing components to perform logical and bit operations across multiple rows of a frame.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional processing systems are used to handle image data, then processing can be performed with standard components, but processing speed and data transfer speed mismatch reduces system performance and prevents efficient handling of complex computational processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoiderror correction integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the image frame into multiple rows and processes each row independently through parallel CRC validation. Each row's encoding is validated separately while maintaining overall frame integrity, allowing high-speed parallel processing without compromising error correction reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by appending CRC encoding bits to each row of the image frame before parallel processing. This pre-computation of error correction codes enables rapid validation during parallel processing while maintaining data integrity throughout the high-speed computational pipeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If parallel processing is implemented to increase processing speed, then computational throughput improves, but system complexity increases requiring specialized architectures like SIMD

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational throughputVSAvoidprocessor architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple processing operations into a unified parallel processing framework where row encoding, CRC validation, and frame assembly are combined into a single coordinated process. This integration achieves high computational throughput while managing architecture complexity through consolidated processing logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements multi-functionality by designing a processing system that simultaneously performs encoding validation, error detection, and frame reconstruction through parallel operations. The same processing infrastructure handles multiple tasks (validation, correction, assembly) that would otherwise require separate dedicated systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If multiple processing passes are used to ensure data validation accuracy, then error detection reliability improves, but processing time increases reducing overall system performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata validation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains continuity of useful action by performing CRC validation continuously during the parallel processing of each row, rather than requiring separate validation passes. The error correction operation proceeds uninterrupted through the data pipeline, achieving both high accuracy and low latency through continuous single-pass processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-computing and appending CRC encoding bits to each row before the main processing operation. This preliminary error correction setup enables immediate validation during parallel processing without requiring subsequent correction passes, reducing processing delay while maintaining validation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260037264A1Computer architecture to validate image frame and image line data in a single pass
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 NVIDIA CORP
  • US20260037264A1 patent drawing
  • US20260037264A1 patent drawing
  • US20260037264A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of this technical solution can increase processing speed in low-latency application areas, while maintaining integrity of error correction detection at those higher speeds. For example, in image-processing environments associated with autonomous navigation (e.g., driving), a large volume of image data is to be rapidly and accurately processed to maintain reliable and up-to-date models of a physical environment. Thus, embodiments in accordance with this disclosure can provide high-speed and accurate error correction of input frame data beyond the capability of CPU processing or general GPU processing to achieve.