Image Frame Error Detection Using Candidate Regions and Object Checks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image recognition technologies using machine learning models struggle with low confidence in detecting errors in real-time image data due to varying characteristics, leading to inaccurate identification of error frames.

Innovation Solution

A dual-machine learning approach is employed, using a first model for error area detection and a second model for image quality scoring, followed by object detection to confirm the presence of objects in the frame, enhancing the confidence of error detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single machine learning model is used for error detection in real-time image data, then the detection speed is maintained, but the confidence and accuracy of error identification deteriorates due to varying characteristics of real-time image data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection confidenceVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the error detection task into two distinct stages performed by separate machine learning models: (1) a first ML model identifies candidate error areas in the image frame, and (2) a second ML model performs object detection to verify whether objects are present in those candidate areas. This segmentation allows each model to specialize in specific aspects of error detection, improving overall confidence while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary verification step using object detection as a mediator between initial error candidate identification and final error confirmation. The object detection model acts as a secondary validator that checks whether the identified candidate error areas contain actual objects, thereby increasing detection confidence without requiring a complete redesign of the detection pipeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple machine learning models are used for error detection, then the accuracy and confidence of error identification is improved, but the processing time and computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection reliabilityVSAvoiddetection processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The first machine learning model performs preliminary action by quickly identifying candidate error areas in the image frame before the more computationally intensive object detection is performed. This preliminary filtering step reduces the scope of subsequent verification by focusing object detection only on suspected error regions rather than the entire image, thereby minimizing additional processing time while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by performing object detection only in candidate error areas identified by the first model, rather than conducting full-image object detection. This selective verification approach applies the additional computational effort only where needed (in candidate error regions), reducing overall processing time while maintaining improved detection reliability through targeted verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250342575A1Electronic device for detecting error in image frame and operation method therefor
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US20250342575A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342575A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342575A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic device may: acquire data on a target frame via a memory, a communication unit, or an image input unit; acquire information on at least one candidate error region included in the target frame using a first machine learning model trained to output information on an error region of a frame; based on the information on the at least one candidate error region, determine whether the target frame corresponds to a candidate error screen; based on the target frame being determined to correspond to a candidate error screen, perform object detection on the target frame to determine whether an object is detected in the target frame; based on an object being detected in the target frame, determine that the target frame is a normal screen; and based on at least one object not being detected in the target frame, determine that the target frame is an error screen.