Image Frame Integration Using Sharpness, Noise, and Jitter Metrics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image frame integration techniques are often degraded by motion blur and noise, failing to effectively combine images due to variations in observation angle and time, leading to suboptimal image quality.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that determine sharpness, noise, and jitter metrics for each image frame, prioritizing or selecting frames based on these metrics to generate an integrated image frame, minimizing the impact of degraded frames and enhancing image resolution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If image frames are integrated to reduce noise, then noise reduction is improved, but motion blur degrades the integrated image quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reductionVSAvoidimage sharpness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of exposure time for different image frames, using longer exposure for some frames and shorter exposure for others. This allows selective integration of frames with different noise and motion blur characteristics, optimizing the trade-off between noise reduction and motion blur in the final integrated image

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial integration by selectively choosing which image frames to integrate based on their quality metrics. Not all captured frames are integrated - only those that meet certain criteria regarding noise levels and motion blur, thus avoiding the degradation that would result from integrating all frames equally

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Quantity of substance

If multiple image frames are captured at different time samples, then more data is available for integration, but spatial shifts and jitter degrade image alignment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of image framesVSAvoidspatial alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary registration and alignment of image frames before integration. By pre-correcting spatial shifts and jitter through registration circuits, the system ensures that frames are properly aligned prior to the integration process, maintaining measurement precision even when multiple frames captured at different times are combined

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces registration circuits as an intermediary step between image capture and integration. These circuits act as a mediator that corrects spatial misalignments and jitter, enabling the successful integration of multiple frames that would otherwise be degraded by positional variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If all image frames are integrated equally, then processing is simplified, but frames with poor quality degrade the overall image

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration processVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different integration weights to different image frames based on their local quality characteristics. Frames with better sharpness, lower noise, and less motion blur receive higher weights in the integration process, while poorer quality frames receive lower weights. This selective weighting maintains image quality without requiring complex rejection criteria

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses feedback mechanisms where quality metrics (sharpness, noise, motion blur) are calculated for each frame, and this information feeds back into the integration process to determine optimal weighting. This closed-loop approach automatically adjusts the contribution of each frame based on its actual quality, simplifying the decision process while maintaining high image quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2453407B1Integrating image frames
Publication Date: 2015.07.01 RAYTHEON CO
  • EP2453407B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2453407B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2453407B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The technology described herein includes integration of image frames. The integration of image frames includes determining a sharpness metric for each image frame in a plurality of image frames. The sharpness metric is indicative of at least one of edge content and an edge size of the image frame. The integration of image frames further includes determining a noise metric for each image frame in the plurality of image frames. The noise metric is indicative of a variation in brightness or color in the image frame. The integration of image frames further includes determining a jitter metric for each image frame in the plurality of image frames. The jitter metric is indicative of spatial shifts between the image frame and other image frames in the plurality of image frames. The integration of image frames further includes generating an integrated image frame from one or more of the plurality of image frames based on the sharpness metric, the noise metric, and the jitter metric.