Image-Guided Weed Control Mode Selection for Targeted Treatment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current weed control methods, particularly in industrial and railway areas, are time-consuming, resource-intensive, and environmentally impactful, as they often require extensive chemical use and manual labor, with limited precision in applying the most appropriate control measures based on vegetation type and location.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and system that utilize image analysis to determine the most suitable mode of operation for vegetation control technologies, such as chemical sprays or high voltage systems, by identifying vegetation types and locations, allowing for targeted and efficient application of the least necessary chemical or energy required for effective weed control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual weed control methods are used, then precision in applying control measures can be achieved, but time consumption and resource requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of weed control applicationVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical inspection and control application with an automated system using cameras for image capture, processing units for image analysis, and automated control mechanisms. This substitution maintains precision while dramatically reducing time consumption by enabling continuous automated monitoring and control application without manual intervention for each weed identification and treatment decision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing the apparatus to automatically identify weeds through image analysis, determine appropriate control measures, and execute control applications without requiring continuous human intervention. The processing unit autonomously analyzes images, identifies vegetation, and triggers control mechanisms, making the system self-sufficient in the weed control process while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If extensive chemical usage is employed for weed control, then effective vegetation control can be achieved, but environmental impact increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness of weed controlVSAvoidenvironmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using image analysis to identify specific weed locations and characteristics, then applying control measures only to those specific locations rather than treating entire areas uniformly. This targeted approach maintains effectiveness by addressing actual weed problems while minimizing chemical usage and environmental impact by treating only where necessary based on detected vegetation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs partial action by applying chemical control measures only to the extent necessary - specifically targeting identified weed locations rather than applying chemicals broadly. The image analysis determines precise application zones, ensuring chemicals are used only where vegetation control is needed, thereby maintaining reliability while reducing overall chemical consumption and environmental harm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If uniform weed control is applied across all areas, then operational simplicity is maintained, but resource efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of control operationVSAvoidresource efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by making the control operation adaptive rather than static. The system continuously captures images, dynamically analyzes vegetation conditions, and adjusts control applications based on real-time detection results. This dynamic approach maintains operational simplicity through automation while improving resource efficiency by applying controls only where and when needed, rather than using fixed uniform schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by using image analysis to identify and locate weeds before applying control measures. The processing unit analyzes images in advance to determine where vegetation control is needed, allowing the system to prepare targeted control applications beforehand. This preliminary identification maintains operational simplicity through automated detection while significantly improving resource efficiency by preventing unnecessary chemical applications in weed-free areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11377806B2Apparatus for weed control
Publication Date: 2022.07.05 BAYER AG
  • US11377806B2 patent drawing
  • US11377806B2 patent drawing
  • US11377806B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for weed control includes a processing unit that receives at least one image of an environment. The processing unit analyses the at least one image to determine at least one mode of operation of a vegetation control technology from a plurality of modes of operation of the vegetation control technology to be used for weed control for at least a first part of the environment. An output unit outputs information that is useable to activate the vegetation control technology in the at least one mode of operation.