Laser Machining Error Detection With Image-Height Neural Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current laser machining systems require complex and time-consuming parameterization processes for quality evaluation and error detection, which are typically expert-dependent and lead to lengthy production interruptions and a high risk of incorrect parameterization, especially when adjusting to new materials or machining processes.

Innovation Solution

A system that assesses the quality of laser machining and detects machining errors using a combination of image and height data from a workpiece surface, processed by a computing unit with a transfer function, preferably implemented using a neural network, allowing for automatic and adaptive evaluation without the need for extensive parameter adjustment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If complex parameterization processes are used for quality evaluation, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality evaluation precisionVSAvoidparameterization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses self-service by automatically selecting and adjusting parameters through machine learning algorithms. The system evaluates quality based on automatically determined parameters rather than requiring manual expert configuration, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting evaluation parameters based on learned patterns from training data. Instead of using fixed complex parameterization, the system adapts parameters automatically to achieve precise quality evaluation with simplified processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If expert-dependent parameterization is used, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to training and adjustment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection precisionVSAvoidproduction interruption time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary action by pre-training the machine learning model with comprehensive quality data before actual production use. This preliminary training phase captures expert knowledge in advance, allowing the system to operate autonomously during production without requiring ongoing expert intervention or causing production interruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical expert-dependent parameterization process with an automated machine learning system. The computational model substitutes human experts, automatically performing quality evaluation without requiring their time or causing production interruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If extensive parameter adjustment is required for new materials, then adaptability decreases, but measurement precision is maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality assessment accuracyVSAvoidmaterial adaptation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by making the parameter selection process adaptive and flexible. The machine learning model can dynamically adjust to new materials through retraining with material-specific data, maintaining measurement precision while improving adaptability to different workpiece materials and machining conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves universality by designing a flexible machine learning framework that can handle multiple material types and machining processes. The same core system adapts to different materials through data-driven parameter adjustment, eliminating the need for separate expert parameterization for each material type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11536669B2Detecting machining errors of a laser machining system using deep convolutional neural networks
Publication Date: 2022.12.27 PRECITEC GMBH
  • US11536669B2 patent drawing
  • US11536669B2 patent drawing
  • US11536669B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for detecting machining errors for a laser machining system for machining a workpiece includes: a detection unit for detecting image data and height data of a machined workpiece surface; and a computing unit. The computing unit is designed to generate an input tensor based on the detected image data and height data and to determine an output tensor on the basis of the input tensor using a transfer function. The output tensor contains information on a machining error.