Image Inspection Analysis for Luminance-Aware Defect Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing inspection systems struggle to accurately detect defects on coated surfaces due to challenges in improving the accuracy of defect detection, particularly in the analysis of the relationship between the irradiation region and the inspection target region.

Innovation Solution

An analysis apparatus that extracts images where the irradiation region and the inspection target region have a predetermined relationship, utilizing hardware processors to analyze the state of the inspection target region based on image information, and employs learned models for enhanced defect detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If images are captured under varying light conditions to cover more inspection areas, then the coverage area increases, but the measurement precision deteriorates due to luminance non-uniformity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection coverage areaVSAvoiddefect detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the inspection process by dividing images into multiple regions based on luminance characteristics. It identifies a first region with uniform luminance and a second region with non-uniform luminance, then processes each region differently to maintain detection accuracy across the entire inspection area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by using different analysis methods for different regions of the image. The first region (uniform luminance) and second region (non-uniform luminance) receive different processing treatments, optimizing defect detection for each specific luminance condition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If complex illumination control is implemented to maintain uniform luminance, then the measurement precision improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidillumination control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by using the captured image data itself to identify and correct for luminance non-uniformity. The system automatically detects regions with non-uniform luminance and applies appropriate processing, eliminating the need for complex external illumination control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes processing parameters based on luminance characteristics. It dynamically adjusts the defect detection algorithm based on whether a region has uniform or non-uniform luminance, adapting the inspection parameters to match the actual lighting conditions without requiring physical illumination changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If all captured images are analyzed to ensure no defects are missed, then the reliability improves, but the loss of time increases due to processing large data volumes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect inspection reliabilityVSAvoidimage processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and processes only the most relevant information from captured images. By identifying and focusing on regions with non-uniform luminance and using region-specific processing, it reduces the overall data processing burden while maintaining comprehensive defect coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by using different processing intensities for different regions. The first region with uniform luminance receives standard processing, while the second region with non-uniform luminance receives enhanced processing, optimizing the balance between reliability and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12626348B2Analysis apparatus, inspection system, and learning apparatus
Publication Date: 2026.05.12 KONICA MINOLTA INC
  • US12626348B2 patent drawing
  • US12626348B2 patent drawing
  • US12626348B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An analysis apparatus includes: a hardware processor that: acquires image information items of a plurality of images regarding a target that are captured while the target is irradiated with light, extracts, based on the image information items, an image in which an irradiation region where the target is irradiated with the light and an inspection target region of the target have a predetermined relationship, from among the images, and analyzes a state of the inspection target region based on each of the image information items of the extracted image.