Image Object Alteration Rules for Automatic Privacy Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image capturing and sharing technologies lack user-controlled options for selectively altering or removing specific objects in images, relying on manual editing or ineffective pixel-level perturbations that fail to prevent recognition by trained systems.

Innovation Solution

A privacy system that dynamically applies user-defined alteration rules to images, determining whether and how to alter objects based on predefined rules, including replacement or see-through methods, ensuring privacy preferences are honored across image-display ecosystems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual editing is used to alter objects in images, then privacy control is achieved, but user convenience and time efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy controlVSAvoidmanual editing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects objects in images and applies alteration rules without requiring manual user intervention. The privacy system processes images autonomously by identifying objects matching predefined criteria and applying appropriate alterations, thereby eliminating the need for manual editing while maintaining privacy control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Users pre-configure alteration rules and object criteria before image processing. The system stores these predefined rules and automatically applies them when processing images, eliminating the need for real-time manual editing and ensuring consistent privacy protection across multiple images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If pixel-level perturbations are applied to images, then some privacy protection is provided, but effectiveness against trained recognition systems deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidrecognition accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and removes specific identifiable objects from images based on predefined alteration rules. Instead of applying subtle perturbations that leave recognition possible, the system completely removes or alters target objects (such as faces or identifiable features), thereby eliminating recognition accuracy while maintaining privacy protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Productivity

If automatic alteration rules are applied to images, then privacy control and time efficiency are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage processing efficiencyVSAvoidprivacy system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The privacy system is divided into distinct functional modules: object detection module, rule evaluation module, and alteration application module. Each module performs a specific task independently, making the overall complex system manageable through clear separation of concerns and specialized processing at each stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs a universal alteration rule engine that can handle multiple types of objects and alteration scenarios through a single unified framework. By designing alteration rules that can apply to various object types and contexts, the system reduces complexity compared to having separate specialized systems for each privacy scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12505238B2Object alteration in image
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 LENOVO (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD
  • US12505238B2 patent drawing
  • US12505238B2 patent drawing
  • US12505238B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment provides a method, including: receiving, at a privacy system, an image comprising an object; determining, using a processor, whether an alteration rule for presentation of the object is applicable to the image; and transmitting, responsive to determining that the alteration rule is applicable to the image, an indication to at least one image-display destination of an alteration to the object based on the alteration rule. Other aspects are described and claimed.