Image Processing Apparatus Automatic File Naming via Document Type Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing systems impose a heavy load on users when naming digitized documents, as they require manual input of file names using a software keyboard, especially when dealing with multiple types of documents, and existing solutions require pre-registration of naming rules that are fixed during scanning, making it difficult to distinguish between identical features.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus that automatically specifies the type of original document using image data and displays candidate character strings for file naming, allowing users to select and set a file name based on the specified type, reducing the need for manual input and enabling easy file naming.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the user inputs file names manually using a keyboard, then the file naming flexibility is maintained, but the user workload increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser workloadVSAvoidfile naming flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic file naming by extracting features from the scanned original image and matching them with pre-registered specifying rules, eliminating the need for manual user input. The system serves itself by autonomously determining file names based on image analysis results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary component (the automatic naming system with specifying rules) that bridges the gap between manual input flexibility and automated efficiency. The intermediary analyzes image features and applies naming rules to generate appropriate file names without direct user intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Extent of automation

If naming rules are pre-registered and fixed, then the naming process is automated, but the system cannot adapt to new document types without re-registration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenaming automationVSAvoidadaptability to new document types
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the naming system dynamic by allowing the specifying rules to be updated and modified. When a new document type is encountered, the system can learn from it and update the specifying rules accordingly, transitioning from a static to a dynamic rule set that adapts to new requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary registration of specifying rules and naming patterns for common document types. This preliminary setup enables automatic naming for standard documents while maintaining the capability to learn and adapt to new document types through subsequent updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If all possible fixed character strings are displayed on the UI, then users can find desired file names, but the UI becomes overwhelming and search becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefile name selectionVSAvoidUI complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and displays only the relevant fixed character strings that match the detected document type, rather than showing all possible character strings. This extraction approach filters out unnecessary options and presents only the applicable naming choices to the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by customizing the UI display based on the specific document type detected. Different document types receive different sets of relevant character strings, making the UI adapted to each local context rather than presenting a uniform, overwhelming list to all users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Productivity

If the system automatically specifies document type, then naming efficiency improves, but precision in distinguishing identical features decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenaming efficiencyVSAvoiddocument type identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the system presents the automatically determined file name to the user for confirmation or correction. This feedback loop allows the system to learn from user corrections and improve its identification accuracy over time while maintaining high automation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial automation by automatically determining the document type and suggesting file names, but leaves the final confirmation to the user. This partial action approach maintains efficiency while allowing user intervention to ensure precision when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11423681B2Image processing apparatus, method of controlling the same, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2022.08.23 CANON KK
  • US11423681B2 patent drawing
  • US11423681B2 patent drawing
  • US11423681B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing apparatus obtains image data obtained by reading an original, specifies a type of the original using obtained image data, and displays, on a display unit, character strings used for a name of a file of the obtained image data, as selectable candidates of character strings. When a user selects a character string of the candidates of character strings among the candidates of character strings, the image processing apparatus sets the selected character string as a character string used for the name of the file of the image data. The candidates of the character strings displayed on the display unit are selected in accordance with the specified type of the original.