Image Processing Apparatus Selecting Optimal System via Performance Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing systems lack the ability to determine which of multiple image processing apparatuses should perform image processing, leading to inefficient resource utilization and potential mismatch in intended image processing, especially when multiple systems are connected through a network.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus and method that acquire performance information, including processing time and quality, from multiple systems, compare these metrics, and select the optimal system for image processing based on these criteria to ensure efficient and consistent output.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple image processing apparatuses are connected through a network, then the system can perform image processing, but it becomes impossible to determine which apparatus should preferentially perform the processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capabilityVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where image processing apparatuses report their performance information (processing time, quality metrics) to a control apparatus. The control apparatus uses this feedback to determine which apparatus should perform the next image processing task, resolving the ambiguity in multi-apparatus systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a control apparatus as an intermediary between multiple image processing apparatuses. This mediator collects performance information from各 apparatus, compares it, and makes the decision about which apparatus should perform the processing, simplifying the overall system control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If each image processing apparatus performs processing independently, then the system can utilize all available resources, but processing time increases and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent collects performance information from image processing apparatuses in advance, before actual image processing is needed. This preliminary data collection enables the control apparatus to make informed decisions about task allocation, optimizing processing efficiency and reducing overall processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If image processing is performed on transmitted images, then the system can provide comprehensive processing, but duplicate processing may occur causing resource waste

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing completenessVSAvoidresource waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback mechanisms where apparatuses report whether they have already performed processing on transmitted images. This feedback allows the system to identify and avoid duplicate processing, preventing resource waste while maintaining comprehensive processing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8018612B2Image processing apparatuses, methods and systems that select an apparatus for performing image processing on an image
Publication Date: 2011.09.13 FUJIFILM CORP
  • US8018612B2 patent drawing
  • US8018612B2 patent drawing
  • US8018612B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing apparatus includes: an image processing section that performs a predetermined image processing on the image; a first performance information acquiring section that acquires a first performance information including information regarding a time for which the image processing section performs the predetermined image processing on the image; a second performance information acquiring section that acquires a second performance information including information regarding a time for which any image processing apparatus other than the image processing apparatus performs the predetermined image processing on the image; a performance comparison section that compares the first performance information acquired by the first performance information acquiring section with the second performance information acquired by the second performance information acquiring section; a processing apparatus selecting section that selects which of the image processing section of the image processing apparatus or the other image processing apparatus performs the predetermined image processing on the image based on the comparison result by the performance comparison section; and a processing control section that causes either the image processing apparatus or the other image processing apparatus which is selected by the image processing apparatus selecting section to perform the predetermined image processing on the image.