Image Processing Device for Machine Learning Robustness Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image recognition systems using machine learning models struggle to evaluate recognition performance under various environmental changes, leading to reduced accuracy and insufficient robustness.

Innovation Solution

An image processing device and method that generate simulated images reflecting different environmental conditions, allowing users to visually check the robustness of machine learning models by performing image recognition operations on these simulated images and overlaying status images representing recognition statuses onto the simulated images.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If image recognition is performed using a machine learning model under specific conditions, then recognition accuracy is improved, but the system cannot evaluate robustness against environmental changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecognition accuracyVSAvoidrobustness evaluation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by generating simulated images with various environmental conditions (illumination changes, weather effects, camera angle variations) before actual robustness evaluation. This allows the machine learning model to be tested in advance under diverse conditions without requiring real-world data collection for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies of original images through image processing operations to generate simulated images representing different environmental conditions. These copied and modified images serve as test inputs to evaluate model robustness without needing physical replicas or real-world scenarios for each condition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple images under various environmental conditions are used for evaluation, then robustness assessment capability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobustness assessment capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The image processing device performs multiple functions using a single system: it generates simulated images, applies image recognition operations, visualizes recognition results, and evaluates robustness metrics all in one integrated workflow. This multi-functionality avoids the need for separate systems for each task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces simulated images as an intermediary between original images and robustness evaluation. These simulated images serve as a mediator that transforms single-condition input images into multiple-condition test cases without requiring direct manipulation of the evaluation process itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If simulated images are generated through image processing operations, then evaluation under diverse conditions is enabled, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation diversityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial image processing operations that generate sufficient environmental variation for robustness evaluation without creating excessive or unnecessary transformations. The processing is calibrated to produce just enough diversity in simulated images to adequately assess model robustness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous useful action by efficiently chaining image processing operations, recognition operations, and visualization steps together. The workflow is optimized to minimize idle time between operations while ensuring each processing step contributes meaningfully to the robustness evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20250191350A1Image processing device and image processing method
Publication Date: 2025.06.12 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO LTD
  • US20250191350A1 patent drawing
  • US20250191350A1 patent drawing
  • US20250191350A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is an image processing device or method configured to enable a system developer or a system administrator to easily and visually check robustness of a machine learning model against various possible environmental changes on site to thereby build a system with high robustness. In the image processing device or method, a processor performs information processing operations which include, in response to a user's operation to designate an image processing condition, performing an image processing operation on an original image based on the designated image processing condition, generating a simulated image that reproduces an image captured in a specific situation, generating a heat map (status image) that represents a status of recognition of a detection target, and overlaying the heat map on the simulated image to produce a result image as a result of visualization, which is output as display information.