Image Processing Device Selecting Images by Evaluating Multiple Indices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing devices select images based solely on predetermined criteria, potentially overlooking images that excel in other evaluation indices, resulting in suboptimal selections.

Innovation Solution

An image processing device that evaluates images using multiple criteria, applies specific image processing techniques to enhance evaluation values, and selects images based on improved evaluation scores, incorporating correlation data to determine effective processing types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If image processing is applied to improve evaluation values, then image quality is improved, but processing time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of multiple images using multiple evaluation indices before selection. By pre-calculating evaluation values for all candidate images across multiple indices, the system identifies which images require processing and what types of processing would be most beneficial, avoiding unnecessary processing of already high-quality images and reducing overall processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts processing parameters based on evaluation index results. For each image, it identifies specific evaluation indices that need improvement and applies targeted image processing techniques to enhance only those aspects, rather than applying uniform processing to all images. This selective approach improves efficiency and reduces processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple evaluation indices are used to select images, then selection accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation system is segmented into multiple independent evaluation indices, each assessing a specific aspect of image quality (e.g., composition, color, sharpness). This modular approach allows the system to evaluate images comprehensively while maintaining manageable complexity, as each index can be calculated and weighted independently rather than requiring a single complex evaluation function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The image processing device incorporates multiple evaluation indices and processing techniques that can be universally applied to different types of images. The system uses a standardized framework that handles various image types and quality aspects through common evaluation and processing mechanisms, reducing the need for image-specific complex logic while maintaining high selection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If image processing is applied to all images, then overall quality improves, but processing efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall image qualityVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies image processing locally and selectively based on individual image characteristics and evaluation index results. Instead of uniform processing, it identifies specific images that need improvement and applies targeted processing techniques to enhance only those aspects that will most benefit the overall selection quality, thereby maintaining high efficiency while improving overall image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial processing on selected images rather than exhaustive processing on all images. By using multiple evaluation indices to identify only those images that would benefit from processing, and applying processing only to those specific cases, the system achieves sufficient quality improvement without the excessive processing overhead of treating all images uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8928768B2Image processing device and computer-readable computer program product containing image processing program
Publication Date: 2015.01.06 NIKON CORP
  • US8928768B2 patent drawing
  • US8928768B2 patent drawing
  • US8928768B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing device includes: an evaluation unit that evaluates a plurality of images by designating predetermined image characteristics as an evaluation index; an image processing unit that executes image processing, which will affect the evaluation index, on at least one image among the plurality of images; and an image selection unit that selects an image with superiority in an evaluation value calculated in correspondence to the evaluation index, among the plurality of images evaluated by the evaluation unit by factoring in application of the image processing by the image processing unit.