Failure Prioritization in Image Processing Apparatuses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems for managing image processing apparatus failures often lead to incorrect prioritization of faulty parts for replacement, resulting in unnecessary adjustments or incorrect work due to differences between calculated and actual failure priorities, especially for infrequent failures.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes a management unit for accumulating records of past remedies, an identification unit for parts with potential to eliminate errors, a determination unit for assessing failure possibilities based on error history, and a calculation unit for determining failure cause probabilities, providing targeted information for display based on these assessments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the actual number of replacements for a part is large in the field, then the part is prioritized for replacement, but this may lead to unnecessary adjustments or replacement if the part has low failure possibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of failure restorationVSAvoidaccuracy of failure cause identification
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter used for prioritization from simple replacement count to a composite score that incorporates both replacement frequency and failure possibility probability. This transforms the prioritization criterion to balance historical data with diagnostic accuracy, resolving the contradiction between restoration efficiency and identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by using actual field replacement results to update and refine the failure possibility probabilities for different parts. This continuous learning mechanism ensures that the prioritization becomes more accurate over time, reducing both unnecessary replacements and missed failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If replacement priority is determined by actual numbers of replacements, then common failures are addressed effectively, but infrequent failures may have distorted priority orders due to high replacement percentages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of failure diagnosisVSAvoidefficiency of remedy implementation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a weighted scoring system that combines replacement frequency with failure possibility probability, changing the single-parameter prioritization to a multi-parameter approach. This resolves the distortion in priority orders for infrequent failures by balancing statistical frequency with diagnostic likelihood.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If service engineers follow replacement guidance based on high replacement numbers, then resource utilization improves, but costs are wasted on unnecessary adjustments or trial and error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveutilization of replacement partsVSAvoidwaste of time and resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback to service engineers by displaying both the failure possibility probability and the prioritization rank together. This dual-information feedback enables engineers to make informed decisions, avoiding unnecessary replacements of parts with low failure possibility even if they have high replacement counts, thus reducing waste while maintaining efficient resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240248653A1System and method
Publication Date: 2024.07.25 CANON KK
  • US20240248653A1 patent drawing
  • US20240248653A1 patent drawing
  • US20240248653A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system identifies, based on a predetermined error occurring in an image processing apparatus, a plurality of parts each having a possibility of eliminating the predetermined error by being replaced, determines a failure possibility of each of the identified plurality of parts, calculates a failure cause probability of each of the identified plurality of parts based on field results, and provides data for performing a display including parts information including those results.