Image Processing History Display by Mode for Easier Job Retrieval

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional image processing apparatuses face difficulties in conveniently retrieving and selecting desired history information due to the large amount of data and frequent mode switching between different working modes, such as copy and image transmission, leading to inefficient user experience.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus that sets display priorities of history information based on the operation mode, allowing targeted history information to be displayed through narrowing, thereby improving retrieval and selection convenience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If history information is displayed in the order of job execution, then all history information can be stored and accessed, but the user has difficulty retrieving and selecting desired history information when there is a large amount of history information or frequent mode switching

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehistory information retrieval convenienceVSAvoidamount of history information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments history information by operation mode (copy mode, image transmission mode, etc.) and displays them in separate regions on the display screen. This segmentation allows users to easily distinguish and retrieve history information based on the specific operation mode they need, rather than searching through a single undifferentiated list of all history information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by giving different visual characteristics to different operation mode history information. Each operation mode's history information is displayed in a distinct region with potentially different visual styling, making it easy for users to identify and select the desired mode's history information at a glance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of information

If all history information is displayed on the screen, then complete information is available, but the display becomes cluttered and difficult to navigate when there is a large amount of data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehistory information completenessVSAvoidhistory information selection ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the display screen into multiple regions, with each region dedicated to displaying history information for a specific operation mode. This segmentation maintains completeness of information while organizing it in a structured manner that prevents clutter and improves navigability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a spatial dimension to history information display by using different screen regions for different operation modes. Instead of presenting history information as a single linear list, the patent organizes it in a two-dimensional spatial layout that reflects the operational structure of the device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS12395594B2Image processing apparatus that displays history information of executed jobs according to mode of operation and method for controlling image processing apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.08.19 SHARP KK
  • US12395594B2 patent drawing
  • US12395594B2 patent drawing
  • US12395594B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing apparatus including: a job executor; a storage that stores therein history information related to execution of jobs; and a controller that sets a display priority of the history information based on an operation mode of the job executor when calling up the history information.