Image Processing Apparatus Job Cancellation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing apparatuses cannot cancel print processing when both the user with authentication information and the user with authority to eliminate errors are absent, leading to unresolved error states and apparatus unavailability.

Innovation Solution

The image processing apparatus includes a memory device and a processor that allow cancellation of specific jobs without authentication information in case of errors, enabling unauthenticated users to resolve error states by canceling the job causing the issue without compromising security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If authentication information is required to cancel print processing, then security is improved, but the ability to resolve errors when authenticated users are absent deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiderror resolution capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating cancellation authority based on error states. When no error occurs, only authenticated users can cancel jobs. When a specific error occurs, the system locally changes the policy to allow unauthenticated users to cancel only the job causing the error, while maintaining security for other operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by making the cancellation authority dynamic rather than static. The system dynamically adjusts who can cancel jobs based on the current error state of the apparatus. The control unit monitors error states and dynamically changes the authentication requirements for job cancellation accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If unauthenticated users can cancel any job, then error resolution capability is improved, but security deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror resolution capabilityVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by restricting unauthenticated user cancellation authority to only the specific job causing the error, rather than allowing cancellation of any job. The control unit identifies the problematic job and permits cancellation only for that specific job, maintaining security for other jobs while enabling error resolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by allowing unauthenticated users to perform a limited cancellation function only when errors occur and only for the specific job causing the error. This partial authorization is sufficient to resolve errors while minimizing security risks compared to full cancellation authority.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If authentication is required for job cancellation, then unauthorized cancellations are prevented, but the apparatus becomes unavailable when authenticated users are absent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthorization controlVSAvoidapparatus availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by making authorization control dynamic based on error states. When errors occur, the system dynamically adjusts authorization to allow unauthenticated users to cancel the problematic job, thereby maintaining apparatus availability while preserving authorization control for normal operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit acts as an intermediary that monitors error states and mediates between security requirements and availability needs. When errors occur, the control unit intermediates by temporarily relaxing authentication requirements specifically for job cancellation, enabling continued operation while maintaining overall security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10599370B2Image processing apparatus capable of canceling a job, method for controlling image processing apparatus, and recording medium
Publication Date: 2020.03.24 CANON KK
  • US10599370B2 patent drawing
  • US10599370B2 patent drawing
  • US10599370B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing apparatus performs control of accepting an instruction to cancel execution of a job on condition that authentication using authority information input to the image processing apparatus has succeeded, in a case where a predetermined error has not occurred. The image processing apparatus performs control of accepting the instruction to cancel the execution without the authority information input with respect to only a specific job among jobs generated by the image processing apparatus, in a case where the predetermined error has occurred.