Image Processing Apparatus for Print Defect Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing systems fail to accurately detect protrusions of print products from the imaging range, leading to erroneous defect detection, and lack a method to differentiate between intended protrusions due to paper size or conveyance displacement and actual abnormalities.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus that acquires print paper size, sets thresholds for protruding portions based on paper size, detects protrusions, and identifies conveyance displacement abnormalities by determining permissible flags and lengths or areas for protrusions within the imaging range.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the protruding region is set as a non-inspection region to prevent erroneous detection, then false defect detection is reduced, but the ability to detect actual conveyance displacement abnormalities is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidabnormality detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the treatment of different regions within the image. Instead of uniformly excluding all protruding regions from inspection, the system selectively applies non-inspection status only to specific protruding regions that are determined to be normal variations based on paper size and conveyance displacement thresholds. This allows the system to maintain high defect detection accuracy in inspected regions while avoiding false positives in legitimately protruding regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by dynamically adjusting the protrusion threshold based on paper size and conveyance displacement characteristics. The system calculates permissible protrusion distances as parameters that change according to the specific printing conditions, allowing the inspection system to adapt its sensitivity and accurately distinguish between normal protrusions and actual defects or abnormalities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Area of stationary object

If comparison is made by extrapolation of pixel value to protruding region, then complete coverage inspection is achieved, but erroneous defect detection occurs in protruding regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection coverage areaVSAvoiddefect detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing region-specific inspection strategies. The system identifies protruding regions and applies different processing rules to them compared to normal regions. Specifically, protruding regions are marked as non-inspection regions when they exceed permissible thresholds, preventing erroneous defect detection while maintaining thorough inspection coverage in valid areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the image into different regions based on protrusion characteristics. By dividing the image into inspected regions and non-inspected protruding regions, the system can apply appropriate processing to each segment, ensuring comprehensive coverage where needed while avoiding false positives in protruding areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If a fixed non-inspection region is set for all print products, then processing is simplified, but adaptability to different paper sizes and conveyance conditions is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection system complexityVSAvoidpaper size adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by making the non-inspection region boundaries dynamic rather than fixed. The protrusion thresholds are calculated based on paper size and conveyance displacement characteristics, allowing the inspection system to automatically adapt to different printing conditions. This dynamic approach maintains relatively simple processing logic while achieving high adaptability across various paper sizes and conveyance scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12108004B2Image processing apparatus and image processing method for inspecting presence/absence of a defect in a print product
Publication Date: 2024.10.01 CANON KK
  • US12108004B2 patent drawing
  • US12108004B2 patent drawing
  • US12108004B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing apparatus includes a print setting acquisition unit configured to acquire a print paper size, a threshold setting unit configured to set, based on the print paper size, a threshold for a protruding portion of a print product, the protruding portion protruding from a reading range, an image acquisition unit configured to acquire a scanned image of the print product, a detection unit configured to detect the protruding portion from the scanned image, and a conveyance displacement abnormality detection unit configured to detect conveyance displacement abnormality from the threshold and a result of the detection.