Image Processing Apparatus Priority-Based Trapping Judgment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing systems require sequential determination of multiple process conditions for image adjustment processing, leading to increased processing time and potential degradation in efficiency.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus and method that prioritize process conditions, allowing for efficient judgment and execution of image adjustment processing by determining whether image components satisfy process conditions in order of priority, with higher priority given to conditions that do not require image adjustment processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple process conditions are determined sequentially to ensure comprehensive image adjustment processing, then the completeness of image processing is improved, but the processing time increases and efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of image processingVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-establishing a priority order for multiple process conditions before actual image processing occurs. The system stores priority information indicating the determination order of process conditions in advance, so when image components are processed, the system can quickly evaluate conditions in the predetermined priority sequence without performing exhaustive sequential checks, thus reducing processing time while ensuring comprehensive coverage of necessary adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If all process conditions are evaluated to ensure accurate process content selection, then the accuracy of processing decisions is improved, but the determination time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of process content selectionVSAvoiddetermination time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-defining and storing priority information that specifies the determination order of process conditions. This allows the determination unit to evaluate conditions in a predetermined sequence, stopping once the first satisfied condition is found, thereby maintaining accurate process content selection while significantly reducing determination time compared to evaluating all conditions exhaustively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and utilizes only the necessary process conditions by implementing a priority-based evaluation system. Instead of evaluating all possible process conditions, the system extracts and evaluates conditions in priority order, taking out only the relevant conditions that need to be checked first, thus reducing determination time while maintaining accuracy in process content selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Adaptability or versatility

If a rule base with multiple process conditions is accessed to handle various image adjustment scenarios, then the versatility of the system is improved, but the complexity of the determination process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling capability of image adjustment scenariosVSAvoidcomplexity of determination process
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system reduces determination process complexity by performing preliminary action - pre-establishing and storing priority information that defines the evaluation sequence of process conditions. This pre-organization allows the determination unit to systematically evaluate conditions in a predetermined order, making the complex rule base more manageable and reducing the cognitive and computational complexity of the determination process while maintaining versatility in handling various image adjustment scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7782484B2Image processing apparatus, image processing method, and recording medium storing program product for causing computer to function as image processing apparatus
Publication Date: 2010.08.24 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS TECH INC
  • US7782484B2 patent drawing
  • US7782484B2 patent drawing
  • US7782484B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing apparatus allowing efficient trapping/overprint is provided. A CPU of a printer serving as the image processing apparatus includes an object extraction unit extracting a component image from image data, a pair extraction unit extracting a pair from a plurality of objects, a calculation unit calculating an overlapping print amount for each of primary colors of color materials of each component image, a rule storing unit storing a plurality of process contents and rules for executing processing, a process content storing unit storing the process contents, a judgment unit judging whether or not a pair of the image components satisfies the rule associated with a priority, and an execution unit for executing the processing of trapping or overprint.