Image Processing Apparatus Selective Rasterization for Prohibited Image Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In image processing apparatuses, the detection processing for avoiding the printing of prohibited images is often delayed due to the presence of large white data regions, which do not require conversion from vector to raster form, leading to inefficient processing times.

Innovation Solution

The apparatus selectively generates image data in a raster form using PDL data and excludes regions without printing data from detection processing, while adding a white image between linked RIP bands to prevent erroneous detections, thereby reducing the detection processing target and enhancing processing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If detection processing is performed on the entire image data including white regions, then printing prohibition can be ensured, but processing time increases due to unnecessary detection in white regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting prohibition detectionVSAvoiddetection processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The image data is divided into multiple regions, and pattern recognition is selectively applied only to regions that contain printing data. This segmentation approach allows the system to process only relevant areas, reducing overall processing time while maintaining detection reliability for prohibited images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different processing approaches are applied to different regions of the image based on their characteristics. Regions with printing data undergo pattern recognition for prohibition detection, while white regions without printing data are excluded from detection processing, optimizing the quality and efficiency of the detection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If pattern recognition is executed on all image data, then comprehensive prohibition detection is achieved, but productivity decreases due to processing overhead in non-printing areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprohibited image detectionVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and identifies regions containing printing data from the overall image data, then applies pattern recognition only to these extracted regions. This extraction process eliminates unnecessary processing in white regions, thereby improving productivity while maintaining comprehensive detection capability for prohibited images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of performing pattern recognition on the entire image data (excessive action), the system applies pattern recognition only to the extent necessary - specifically to regions containing printing data (partial action). This partial action approach maintains sufficient detection reliability while significantly improving processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of time

If white regions are excluded from detection processing, then processing speed increases, but erroneous detection may occur at boundaries between regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection processing timeVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A white image is introduced as an intermediary element between adjacent regions containing printing data. This intermediary white image prevents direct adjacency of printing data regions, thereby eliminating erroneous detection at boundaries while maintaining the efficiency benefit of excluding pure white regions from detection processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10607103B2Image processing apparatus, control method therefor, and program
Publication Date: 2020.03.31 KONICA MINOLTA INC
  • US10607103B2 patent drawing
  • US10607103B2 patent drawing
  • US10607103B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing apparatus includes: a hardware processor that: generates image data in a raster form on the basis of PDL data described in a page description language; stores the image data generated by the hardware processor; and outputs a predetermined signal in a case where an image of the image data stored in the hardware processor is determined as an image including a predetermined pattern, wherein the hardware processor executes pattern recognition with respect to a region, which includes printing data, in the image of the image data, and does not execute the pattern recognition with respect to a region, which does not include printing data, in the image of the image data.