Image Processing Sequence Generation Using Probability-Based Learning Set Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing techniques require excessive time to generate a desired image processing sequence, especially when dealing with multiple types of defect-free images, due to the limitations in the number and types of inspection area images that can be processed.

Innovation Solution

A method that selects a smaller number of learning sets and iteratively refines the image processing sequence by comparing output images with target images, using a probability-based selection of learning sets to increase the efficiency of the sequence generation process, until a predetermined reference condition is met.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the number of learning images used for evaluation is increased to restrain overlearning, then the evaluation accuracy is improved, but the processing time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-processes learning images to extract feature values before the genetic programming evaluation phase. By preparing feature values in advance, the system reduces the computational burden during evaluation, allowing for more learning images to be used without proportionally increasing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the learning images into multiple groups and processes them in stages. Instead of evaluating all learning images simultaneously, the system segments the evaluation process to manage computational complexity and reduce overall processing time while maintaining evaluation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If multiple types of good-quality images without defect are prepared for evaluation, then the evaluation accuracy is improved, but the processing time increases due to the limited number and types of inspection area images

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates synthetic or augmented versions of good-quality images by applying various transformations and compositions. Instead of requiring multiple physically different defect-free images, the system generates multiple variants through copying and transforming existing high-quality images, thereby expanding the evaluation dataset without proportionally increasing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes to existing good-quality images, such as adjusting brightness, contrast, or other image parameters, to generate multiple types of inspection area images. This approach allows the system to create diverse evaluation images from a limited set of source images, improving evaluation accuracy while maintaining processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240038334A1Method for generating image processing sequence, generation device, and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing computer program
Publication Date: 2024.02.01 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US20240038334A1 patent drawing
  • US20240038334A1 patent drawing
  • US20240038334A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method for generating an image processing sequence, when selecting a learning set, a probability of selection of the learning set having a predetermined value, of a plurality of subject evaluation values corresponding respectively to two or more learning sets calculated in a previous routine, is increased.