Image Processing Apparatus Streak Noise Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing systems fail to accurately distinguish between streak-like noise and document edges, leading to incorrect removal of document edges during image cropping, resulting in undesirable output images with background noise included.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus that employs two distinct methods for detecting and removing streaks from images: one using difference images in both longitudinal and transverse directions, and another using a histogram of edge pixel counts, ensuring accurate separation of document edges from noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single method for detecting streaks is used, then the processing is simple, but the accuracy of distinguishing streaks from document edges deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the streak detection process into two distinct methods: (1) difference image method that compares adjacent lines to detect streaks, and (2) histogram method that analyzes pixel value distributions. Each method segments different aspects of streak characteristics, and their results are combined to achieve accurate detection while maintaining reasonable processing complexity through modular implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by detecting streaks through multiple different detection parameters and methods. The difference image method detects changes in pixel values between adjacent lines, while the histogram method detects changes in pixel value distributions. By changing detection parameters and methods, the system achieves higher accuracy in distinguishing streaks from document edges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If streak detection is performed aggressively, then streak removal is improved, but document edge preservation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestreak removal effectivenessVSAvoiddocument edge preservation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by using multiple detection methods that provide complementary information about streak presence. The difference image method provides feedback on local pixel value changes, while the histogram method provides feedback on overall pixel value distributions. This multi-feedback mechanism enables the system to distinguish between actual streaks and document edges more reliably, preventing erroneous removal of document edges while effectively removing streaks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial action by applying different detection thresholds and methods to different regions of the image. The difference image method is applied to detect local streak variations, while the histogram method is applied to detect overall image characteristics. This partial application of different detection strategies allows effective streak removal while preserving document edges that may be mistaken for streaks in individual methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If document range detection is performed on images with streaks, then processing is straightforward, but detection accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoiddocument range detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing streak removal processing before document range detection. The controller first detects and removes streaks from the scanned image using the difference image method and histogram method, then performs document range detection on the cleaned image. This preliminary streak removal ensures that subsequent document range detection is not adversely affected by streak interference, maintaining both processing simplicity and detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12003685B2Image processing apparatus, control method, and non-transitory computer-readable medium
Publication Date: 2024.06.04 SHARP KK
  • US12003685B2 patent drawing
  • US12003685B2 patent drawing
  • US12003685B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing apparatus includes: an input device that inputs a document image; and a controller, wherein the controller removes a streak from the image by a first method, removes a streak from the image by a second method that differs from the first method, and executes crop processing on the image from which the streaks have been removed.